Schrodinger wave eqn for a beam of monoenergeticc electrons

sagarbhathwar
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
The problem is to apply Schrodinger wave equation to a beam of mono energetic electrons and show that the probability of finding electron at each point on the beam is constant


(d2ψ/dx2) + (8∏^2m/h^2)(E-V)ψ = 0
I have been taught to apply this to a single particle for various cases(potential wells, potential barriers and potential steps). But I don't know how to apply this for a beam of electrons.

I would appreciate any help. Thank you

P.S. - I have no idea how to go about approaching the problem. So, I am unable to show any work. I apologize.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Schrodinger equation can be applied to a beam of mono-energetic electrons by considering the wave function of the beam as an envelope of the individual wave functions of the electrons. The equation for the wave function of the beam can be written as:(d2ψ/dx2) + (8∏^2m/h^2)(E-V)ψ = 0where m is the mass of the electron, h is Planck's constant and V is the potential energy of the beam. This equation can be solved to find the wave function of the beam. Integrating this wave function over the length of the beam gives the probability of finding an electron at each point on the beam, which is found to be constant.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top