Schrödinger Equation (why are U and -x^2 =0?)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the Schrödinger Equation and the specific condition where U and -x^2 equal zero. The original poster expresses confusion about why U cannot simply be set to zero, as it is defined as a function of x within the problem constraints. There is an emphasis on the independence of x, which can take values between -L and L. The poster seeks clarification on their reasoning and the validity of their procedure. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of interpreting the equation and the conditions involved.
Que7i
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
New poster has been reminded to use LaTeX for math equations (not pictures of their work)
Homework Statement
A subatomic particle with mass m is in a one-dimensional potential well. The potential energy is infinite for x < −L and for x > +L, while for −L < x < L, the potential energy is given by:U(x) =(−ℏ^2x^2)/(mL^2(L^2 − x^2)
The particle is in a stationary state described by the wave function 𝜓(x) = A(1 − x^2/L^2)
for −L < x < +L and by 𝜓(x) = 0 elsewhere. (Assume A is a positive, real constant.)
What is the total energy E of the system in terms of ℏ, m, and L?
Relevant Equations
-ℏ/(2m)d^2𝜓/dx^2+U𝜓=E𝜓
I've already found out how to do it, but, either I got lucky and my procedure is wrong or I just don't get it. Why are U and -x^2 equal 0?
1658321022479.png
1658320980320.png
 

Attachments

  • 1658320869118.png
    1658320869118.png
    13.8 KB · Views: 121
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot pick ##U = 0##, it is given in the problem to be a particular function of x. Furthermore ##x## is an independent variable that can take any value between ##-L## and ##L##.
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
Que7i said:
I've already found out how to do it, but, either I got lucky and my procedure is wrong or I just don't get it. Why are U and -x^2 equal 0?
I can't tell what your reasoning is from your work. Could you explain to us what you're doing?
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top