Schwarzschild radius calculation

AI Thread Summary
The formula for calculating the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole is correctly stated as rs = 2GM / c². However, it is noted that this equation applies specifically to stationary masses, as gravitational effects are influenced by the total energy of a system. For arbitrary systems, the mass (M) should be determined by considering the orbit of a distant body with known mass. In cases where bodies are sufficiently far apart, the formula can be approximated using the special relativity invariant mass, which accounts for the kinetic energy of the system. Overall, the formula is universally applicable under certain conditions.
verschrankung
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
Is this the proper formula for calculating the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole?
rs = 2GM / c2
If it is not, or if anyone has one that might work better, could you refer it to me?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That's correct.
 
Banker said:
That's correct.
Thank you!
 
I'd just add that in Physics now days, M is a systems' rest mass while gravitational effects depend on the total energy. So, the equation is precise only for a stationary mass, I believe.
 
For an arbitrary system, the M would be the mass measured by considering the orbit of a distant body of known mass. In this sense, the formula is universally true. For a system of bodies still far enough apart so curvature is small (and pressure and EM fields are insignificant), it is approximately the SR invariant mass of the system - which will include the KE of the bodies in the overall COM frame.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top