Seeming simple Thermodynamics problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter StickNinja
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses a thermodynamics problem involving a balloon inflated with 5 liters of monatomic gas, initially at 0 degrees Celsius and heated to 60 degrees Celsius at 1 atm pressure. It calculates the heat absorbed by the gas when the balloon does not expand, resulting in a change in internal energy (ΔU) of approximately 166 J. When the balloon expands freely at constant pressure, the change in internal energy is calculated as 277.47 J, leading to work done by the gas of about 111 J. The calculations consider the ideal gas law and the specific heat capacities for monatomic gases. The importance of accounting for mass flow and boundary work in the analysis is also noted.
StickNinja
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A balloon is inflated with 5 liters of monatomic gas at 0 degrees Celsius and heated to 60 degrees Celsius at 1 atm. pressure.
R=8.31J/mol K, Cp=5R/2, and Cv = 3R/2

1. If the balloon does not expand, the heat absorbed by the gas would be what?
2. If the balloon expands freely at constant pressure, the work done by the gas would be what?

...Took me a while, but I figured it out (no mass is entering the system). So here is the solution in case others want to know.

For #1 PV=nRT
P=1 atm=1.01*10^5 Pascals
V=5 liters=.005 m^3
n=Unknown
R=8.31 J/mol K
T=273K, Given

Solving for n, we get .222601 mols

ΔU=nCvΔT --constant volume
ΔU=n*3R/2*60= 166J roughlyFor #2

ΔU=nCpΔT
ΔU=277.47
ΔU=Q+W
W=111J
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll have to take into account the mass flowing into the system. There may also be boundary work involved.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top