Seemingly easy electric potential problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential at a specific point on the y-axis due to two point charges of equal magnitude located on the x-axis. The participants clarify that electric potential is a scalar quantity, which means it does not have direction, unlike electric field vectors. The ambiguity in the problem arises from the unspecified nature of the charges, which can affect the potential if they are not both positive. Despite understanding that potential remains constant along the y-axis due to equidistance from the charges, the original poster struggles to find the numerical answer. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing the scalar nature of potential in solving the problem.
bemigh
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone, check out this question:

Two point charges each of magnitude 2.14 µC are located on the x axis. One is at x=1.39 m, and the other is at x=-1.39 m. Determine the electric potential on the y-axis at y=0.505 m

Alright, so I am working on it, as you do, but then i realized, that the original point charges, the MAGNITUDE of the charges is given. This causes problems. Because then the direction of electric field at the point on the Y axis can have many different directions (when the charge of the original points change). For instance, if both charges are positive, the electric field at the point on the Y axis is 6007.36 N/C, however, if one of them is negative, the field is now 16535.14 N/C (when you add the sum of the vectors, etc etc...

Anyone have any insight??
Cheers
Brent
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Potential is a scalar quantity, not a vector. But of course it does matter whether the charges are positive or negative. The wording is a bit ambiguous, but I'd assume they mean both are positive. Otherwise, what could you say about the potential along the y axis?
 
Hey, Brent again,
I understand what you mean, the potential should be equal all along the Y axis, because along every point of the axis, it is equidistant to each charge. I stll can't seem to find the answer...
Cheers
 
This is worth repeating, 'cause you seem to be overlooking it:

Potential is a scalar quantity, not a vector.

What are you doing with vectors?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top