Semi-circle with small angle harmonic oscillations

Liquidxlax
Messages
312
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a uniform semicircular disk of radius R, which rolls without slipping on a horizontal surface. Recall that the kinetic energy of an object is the sum of the translational kinetic energy of the centre of mass (point C) and the rotational kinetic energy about the Centre of Mass.

Using Lagrangian methods, show that the angular frequency of small oscillations is

ω = sqrt([8g]/[R(9π -16)])

Homework Equations



.5mR2 = Ic + mh2 where h = 4R/3π

L = K - U

dL/dq = (d/dt)(dL/dq')

The Attempt at a Solution



First thing to do is find the center of mass of the object

so i solved for that to get (x,y) = (o, 4R/3π)

Then using that I solved for the moment which equals .5mR2

Using the parallel axis thheorem i found that

.5mR2 - mh2 = Ic

K = .5mv2 + .5Ic2

U = mghcos(∅) ( i think)

This has no R dependence so the Euler Lagrange only acts on theta and omega

problem is it's not work, so i obviously messed up on my kinetic and potential energies.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How are you defining the angle φ? If it's the way I think you're doing it, the potential energy has the wrong sign.

Your expression for the kinetic energy is wrong, though I think it's just a typo. It should be
K=\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}I_c \omega^2You left out the ω. What is your expression for v in terms of ω?
 
Yeah i know i didnt transcribe it from my notes well sorry. I did manage to figure it out though. Not sure how to write out phi. Eaaier to draw it
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top