Sentence from Dummit and Foote

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bashyboy
  • Start date Start date
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



"Two group elements induce the same permutation on ##A## if and only if they are in the same coset of the kernel (if and only if they are in the same fiber of the permutation representation). In particular an action of ##G## on ##A## may also be viewed as a faithful action of ##G/\ker \varphi## on ##A##."

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I am having trouble parsing the quotation given above, which comes from Dummit and Foote. Letting ##\varphi : G \to S_A## defined by ##\varphi(g) = \sigma_g## denote the permutation representation, does the first sentence in quotation say "If ##g,h \in G##, then ##\sigma_g = \sigma_h## if and only if ##g,h \in x \ker \varphi## for some ##x \in G## if and only if ##g,h \in \varphi^{-1}(\sigma_y)## for some ##\sigma_y \in S_A##"?

As for the second sentence, it seems to say that the group action of ##G## on ##A## induces a faithful action of ##G/\ker \varphi## on ##A##. What exactly is this induced action? The best I could come up with is ##(g \ker \varphi ) \cdot a = g \cdot a##. Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes and yes. The elements of the kernel are those who map on the identity permutation of ##A## which means they don't contribute to the action. Simultaneously this destroys uniqueness, resp. a faithful action. Dividing it off solves the problem, which of course has to be shown, because such a quotient doesn't always work, e.g. ##C(G/C(G)) \neq_{i.g.} \{1\}##, i.e. the quotient of a group and its center doesn't necessarily lead to a group with a trivial center.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

2
Replies
93
Views
14K
Replies
48
Views
11K
3
Replies
114
Views
10K
Replies
40
Views
17K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
3
Views
8K
4
Replies
175
Views
25K
Back
Top