Series expansion for 2D dipole displaced from the origin

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on expanding electric potential in an infinite series for a 2D line dipole while solving the Laplace equation in polar coordinates. The potential is expressed in terms of coefficients An and Bn, which vary depending on whether the radial distance rho is greater or less than the dipole's position x0. A discrepancy arises at the boundary where rho equals x0, as the potential calculated from the two different An coefficients yields differing signs. This inconsistency raises questions about the correctness of the contour integral used in the calculations. The discussion seeks clarification on the proper handling of coefficients in the series expansion for accurate potential representation.
dilloncyh
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
I learn that we can expand the electric potential in an infinite series of rho and cos(n*phi) when solving the Laplace equation in polar coordinates. The problem I want to consider is the expansion for the potential due to a 2D line dipole (two infinitely-long line charge separated by a small distance). In the attached image, I have written down the potential due to a line dipole (I'm pretty sure it's correct, at least the dot product and the dependence on D and r). Now I place the perfect line dipole at a position (-x0,0), and I want to calculate the potential in terms of the infinite series. The problem is that the coefficient An is different depending on whether rho is bigger than or smaller than x0 when I solve the integral using contour integral (again, pretty sure the definite integral is done correctly). At the 'imaginary' boundary of rho=x0, the potential calculated using the two different An should give the same results, but now they differ by a sign. Why is that? What have I done wrong?
 

Attachments

  • dipole_problem.jpg
    dipole_problem.jpg
    31.5 KB · Views: 531
It's not the same A_n for each case. The expansion has one set of coefficients for r^n and a second set, B_n, for 1/r^n.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top