Seriously? Moment of Force about a specified Axis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a user's struggle to calculate the moment of force about a specified axis, ultimately leading to an incorrect answer. The user outlines their method, which involves using Cartesian vectors and cross products to find the resultant moment. Feedback suggests that the user may have miscalculated the second cross product, indicating that the moment should only have an i component. The user expresses frustration over recurring mistakes despite careful efforts. The conversation emphasizes the importance of reviewing calculations and understanding the concepts behind the cross products.
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
[SOLVED] Seriously? Moment of Force about a specified Axis

So I really thought I understood this. I have attached the problem and attempt at solution. It should be easy to follow. Problem
Picture1-3.png

Attempt at Solution
This was my process:

1. Write each F and each r as cartesian vectors
2. Find each moment by cross product.
3. Add the moments to get resultant moment M_R. Find unit vector along Oa axis=U_oa
4. Use resultant Moment and Unit vector along Oa to find
M_R dot U_oa=|M_oa|
5. Write as Cartesian vector-->|M_oa|*U_oa
Picture2-2.png

The answer is supposed to be 26.1i-15.1j lb*ft. As you can see, my answer isn't close (WTF else is new!)

What is wrong with my method?
Thanks,
Casey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't believe I keep getting the same wrong answer!
 
I think for Moment 2 you suppose to only have (i) term
 
Look at your second cross product again. Don't get discouraged, :-).

Imagine attaching a flexible pipe from the origin to the a point on the line of action of F2 and pulling on it with a rope in the direction of f2, the pipe would begin to trace out a disk and the direction of the moment caused by F2 about the origin would be defined as being perpendicular to this disk and hence must only have an i component.
 
Last edited:
tongpu said:
I think for Moment 2 you suppose to only have (i) term

dontdisturbmycircles said:
Look at your second cross product again. Don't get discouraged, :-).

Thanks guys! I was worried that my method was wrong. I wonder if I will EVER stop making tiny stupid errors. I just can't seem to stop...no matter how careful and aware I think I am being.

Oh well...siggghhh.
Thanks again!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top