Set Theory Identities: A = B if A, B, and C satisfy key set relations

Stevo6754
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Can you conclude that A = B if A, B, and C are sets such that

A \cup C = B \cup C and A \cap C = B \cap C


Homework Equations



The above is part c of a problem. The problems a and b are as follows

A) A \cup C = B \cup C

My answer: I gave a counter example such that A = {a, b, c}, B = {c, d, e}
and C = {a, b, c, d, e}, thus A \cup C = C = B \cup C
but A \neq B

B) A \cap C = B \cap C

My answer: I gave the counter example where A = {a, b, c}, B = {c, d, e}, C = {c}
So, A \cap C = C = B \cap C but A \neq B

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok for this part c I could not think of a counter example. I believe they want me to use set identities. I'm honestly not sure where to begin but Ill tell you what I have in mind so far.

If A \cup C = B \cup C, this implies that (A \cup C) \subseteq (B \cup C), and (B \cup C) \subseteq
(A \cup C)

So, (A \cup C) \subseteq (B \cup C)

Same goes for (A \cap C) \subseteq ( B \cap C),

In order to prove A = B I need to prove A \subseteq B and B \subseteq A.

So I have these premises and a conclusion, but I am honestly not sure how to set this up. I'm pretty sure I need to use set identities.. If anyone has any advice to get me moving here I'd greatly appreciate it, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think it's too hard to prove this by looking at elements in combination with algebraic identities, rather than a purely algebraic proof, if you are inclined to do so.


Rather than trying to prove that A=B, you may find it easier constructing a set that measures how different A and B are, and then proving something about that.


What identities are you considering using? Rewriting equality in terms of subsets is a place to start, but you don't seem to have invoked any properties of union and intersection yet.

I imagine you're probably using a list like the one here, along with the ones in the next section relating meet and join to ordering.

(In your case, the set-theoretic symbols \cap, \cup, \subseteq correspond to the lattice algebra symbols \wedge, \vee, \leq)

FYI, that list of identities is not enough. You need these as well.

You may find identities relating to complementation useful too.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top