Set theory problem (uncountable set)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on a measure and integration problem involving a non-negative real valued function f defined on a set X. The key assertion is that if for any natural number n, the preimage f^{-1}(]\frac{1}{n}, +\infty[) is countable, then the preimage f^{-1}(]0, +\infty[) must also be countable. The conclusion drawn is that a countable union of countable sets remains countable, confirming the validity of the assertion and resolving the problem presented.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of measure theory and cardinality
  • Familiarity with real-valued functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of countable and uncountable sets
  • Basic concepts of integration and preimages in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of cardinal measures, specifically mu(E) = |E|.
  • Explore the implications of the Borel-Cantelli lemma in measure theory.
  • Learn about Lebesgue integration and its conditions for integrability.
  • Investigate the relationship between countable unions and set cardinality in depth.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying measure theory, and anyone involved in advanced calculus or real analysis who seeks to understand the properties of functions in relation to set theory.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32

Homework Statement


I would like to show that if we have a non-negative real valued function f defined on f a set X, and that the set of points where f is non-vanishing is uncountable, then for any M > 0, I can find a sequence {x_n} of points in X such that

[tex]\sum_n f(x_n)>M[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


This is not for a set theory class, its in the context of a measure and integration problem where I want to demonstrate a necessary and sufficient condition for a function to be integrable on a set X with respect to the cardinal measure mu(E) = |E|.

Ok, so I would appreciate to get a confirmation that the following assertion is true, because if it is, then I will have solved the problem I think:

"If for any natural number n,

[tex]f^{-1}(]\frac{1}{n}, +\infty[)[/tex]

is countable, then

[tex]f^{-1}(]0, +\infty[)[/tex]

is countable too."

It seems so to me since it seems natural that a countable union of countable sets in countable and

[tex]\bigcup_{n\geq 1} f^{-1}\left(]\frac{1}{n}, +\infty[\right) = f^{-1}\left(\bigcup_{n\geq 1}]\frac{1}{n}, +\infty[\right)=f^{-1}(]0, +\infty[)[/tex]Thx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A countable union of countables is countable: #(N x N) = #N.
 
sweet. By the end of the thread I didn't really had a doubt left but thanks for confirming, and so fast!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K