Shankar, Ballentine or Zettili for a first book on QM?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miscing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Qm Shankar
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on recommendations for undergraduate-level texts in quantum mechanics, highlighting three books that are well-regarded for their mathematical rigor. The user has a solid foundation in classical physics, ordinary and partial differential equations, linear algebra, and multivariable calculus but lacks knowledge in analytical mechanics and quantum mechanics. Zettili is noted for its detailed solved problems and derivations, though it may not cover some important topics thoroughly. Another recommended book features a comprehensive 600-page content with an impressive 200-page appendix, which the user found beneficial alongside Zettili. While Shankar's book is criticized for being overly verbose and dull, it is still acknowledged as a significant resource. Ballentine's book is suggested as an excellent choice for a second text in quantum mechanics. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of selecting texts that balance depth and clarity for effective learning in quantum mechanics.
Miscing
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
All three seem to be loved, mathematically rigorous, and appropriate as undergraduate-level texts. I have a good knowledge of classical physics, ODEs and PDEs, linear algebra and multivar calculus, but no knowledge of analytical mechanics or QM. Some opinions on these or other recommendations would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zettili contains many solved problems and derivations are in general detailed, but it is short on explaining some/many important topics.
A book that I had the pleasure in reading was:https://www.amazon.com/dp/0199560277/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Its contains around 600 pages of chapters and a 200 pages appendix (an awesome appendix).
I did supplement some parts of this book with Zettili's. My own reviews of both can be found here:
https://sites.google.com/site/muhanad/home/books

I am not a fan of Shankar's, gets me bored easily (kind of too wordy ?)
I haven't used Bellentine's before.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
shankar of course
 
Zettilli is incredible. I would put it over Shankar.
 
I don't venture myself anymore on suggestions as to which book to start with; I can say, however, that you should have Ballentine's book as a prime candidate for a second book on quantum mechanics.
 
Awesome, thanks for the replies!
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top