Shape of field line in an electric dipole

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the intersection point C(m,0) of an electric field line from a dipole formed by charges +q and -q located at A(0,h) and B(0,-h) respectively. The attempt to apply Gauss' law leads to an integral that seems unsolvable for m, indicating a potential error in the setup or calculations. Participants clarify the integration process, emphasizing the need to consider the symmetry of the electric field and the correct form of the integrand. The conversation highlights confusion regarding the constant k and the integration limits, suggesting a deeper examination of the assumptions made in the calculations. Overall, the thread reflects a collaborative effort to resolve the complexities of electric dipole field line analysis.
darkrystal
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a xy-plane, we have a +q charge in A(0,h) and a -q charge in B(0,-h).
Let's take a field line passing through A, that has horizontal slope in A. Find the point C(m,0) where this field line intersects the X axis.

Homework Equations



I think Gauss' law \epsilon_0 \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A}=q


The Attempt at a Solution



Let's take a surface passing through A and following the field lines till the y=0 plane. Apply the Gauss' law to it: the flux is only through the base of this surface, so that we should get
\displaystyle q=\epsilon_0 \int d\Phi = \epsilon_0 \int_0^m \frac{2khq}{(x^2+h^2)^{\frac32}} \cdot 2 \pi x dx​
where the second integral is the flux calculated for concentric rings around the origin. This equation, though, has no solutions for m, since it reduces to
\displaystyle h(\frac{1}{h}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{h^2+m^2}})=1​
which is clearly impossible...

Thank you all for your time, and please forgive my bad english and my even worse physics :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's early and I think I'm missing something here but I'll get the ball rolling, I'm starting by assuming you got to the integral correctly and had the correct integrand

First, what happened to k? Second, you're integrating over x in that integral, the only dependency on x is just, well, that single x
 
I'll write it in a bit more detail. Let's take the flux across a ring (x to x+dx). The distance of every point of this ring from the two charges is the same, so the electric field must be the same on the whole ring. We get this field by multiplying by 2 the y-component of the field generated by the first charge only (this should be true by symmetry). Putting all together, the field SHOULD be (2) \cdot \frac{kq}{x^2+h^2} \cdot \frac{h}{\sqrt{x^2+h^2}}, where the first 2 is to take in account the doubling I was talking about, the first fraction is the field generated by the first charge, and the second the cosine of the angle (to get only one the y-component). Then I'm multiplying all by the area of the ring, and that's all for the integrand.
For k... that's what puzzles me, mainly. Taking what I can out of the integral, I get a \epsilon_0 4 \pi k, and everything magically vanishes...

For the integral, I got \int \frac{x}{(x^2+h^2)^{\frac32}} = - \frac{1}{\sqrt{h^2+x^2}}, and I think this should be correct (anyways, if anybody is willing to check...)

Just one last thing: in the integrand... there isn't only one x... I couldn't get what you meant, sorry

Thank you very much for your answer, anyway!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top