SHM: Different Final Answers When Using Energy Conversation & Trigonometry

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a pendulum-like scenario where a tyre swings from a tree branch, and participants are tasked with determining the maximum height it reaches above its equilibrium position after being displaced. The context includes concepts from simple harmonic motion (SHM), energy conservation, and trigonometry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss two methods for calculating the maximum height: energy conservation and trigonometric analysis. They raise questions about the significant difference in results obtained from these approaches and explore the implications of using approximations for larger angles in pendulum motion.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the limitations of the trigonometric method for larger angles and the inaccuracies that can arise in such scenarios. There is an acknowledgment of the need for careful consideration of assumptions in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the pendulum's behavior deviates from ideal SHM due to the angle of displacement being nearly 50°, which may lead to larger errors in calculations. Additionally, there are mentions of formatting issues with MathTex expressions that participants are trying to resolve.

Oz Alikhan
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
1. The Question from Text:

"A forest playground has a tyre hanging from a tree branch. The tyre behaves like a pendulum, with a rope of 4.0 metres length, and the tyres mass 15 kg. A child of mass 45 kg swings on the tyre by pulling it 3.0 metres to one side and leaping on. What is the maximum height that the tyre will reach above its equilibrium position?" 3. The Solutions:

Through Energy Conservation

T = 2∏ \sqrt{l/g} ≈4.0s
ω = 2∏/T ≈1.6 rad/s

Therefore, V_max = Aω = 3.0 x 1.6 = 4.7 (Using unrounded T & ω)

Max K.E = 0.5*(15+45)*(4.7)^2 = 660 J

Max P.E = 660 J = mgh
h = 660/mg = 1.1 mThrough Trigonometry

The right angled triangle: Cosθ = 3/4
If I use Pythagoras Theorem, I get \sqrt{4^{2} - 3^{2}} = \sqrt{7}
Then, 4 - \sqrt{7} = 1.35 mWhy is there a significant difference in my answers? (Quick side note: Why doesn't my MathTex not work?)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oz Alikhan said:
1. The Question from Text:

"A forest playground has a tyre hanging from a tree branch. The tyre behaves like a pendulum, with a rope of 4.0 metres length, and the tyres mass 15 kg. A child of mass 45 kg swings on the tyre by pulling it 3.0 metres to one side and leaping on. What is the maximum height that the tyre will reach above its equilibrium position?"


3. The Solutions:

Through Energy Conservation

T = 2∏ \sqrt{l/g} ≈4.0s
ω = 2∏/T ≈1.6 rad/s

Therefore, V_max = Aω = 3.0 x 1.6 = 4.7 (Using unrounded T & ω)

Max K.E = 0.5*(15+45)*(4.7)^2 = 660 J

Max P.E = 660 J = mgh
h = 660/mg = 1.1 m


Through Trigonometry

The right angled triangle: Cosθ = 3/4
If I use Pythagoras Theorem, I get \sqrt{4^{2} - 3^{2}} = \sqrt{7}
Then, 4 - \sqrt{7} = 1.35 m


Why is there a significant difference in my answers? (Quick side note: Why doesn't my MathTex not work?)

A pendulum is not a "good" SHM device except for small displacement angles (where "small" means sin(θ) ≈ θ). Here your angle is nearly 50°, so expect large inaccuracies!

MathTex expressions should be between appropriate tags that flag MathTex to interpret the enclosed text. For expression embedded in text you can use [ itex ] and [ /itex ] (no spaces) or a pair of ## . Larger, one expression per line version uses tags[ tex ] ... [ /tex ] (again no spaces) or a pair of $$'s
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Oh I see. The Trigonometry method is a linear approximation that does not take into account of the larger angles where the approximation deviates from this linearity. That explains the difference in answers .

Thanks for clearing that up :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K