Shooting images through window pane glass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the transparency of pane glass used in a domed observatory and its impact on imaging quality. Concerns are raised about the optical properties of window glass, including its flatness and potential color errors, which may affect CCD camera performance for astrometry. The use of a wind screen is debated, with considerations of air stability versus potential transparency issues. A reference is made to a Mylar window used in extreme temperatures, highlighting an alternative for better optical quality. Ultimately, the original query about glass transparency becomes irrelevant due to limitations with the shutter control circuit.
solarblast
Messages
146
Reaction score
2
For a simple starter, I'm curious what the transparency of pane glass is.

Moreover, we have a domed observatory and one of the two shutters (lower) has a common window pane about 3' on a side. In fact, there are three elements of the shutter area; upper, lower, and a wind screen (below the lower shutter). Typically, we do not use the wind screen. When used it can be attached to the lower shutter, and drawn up from a spool on which the screen is wound. In this format, it has the advantage of keeping air from circulating into the dome, and providing air stability.

It recently was brought to my attention that maybe the wind screen should be in use because of the stability just mentioned. However, that may not be good if the window transparency is say 70-80%. The CCD camera on the telescope is use for astrometry, so b/w is fine. No need for color photography. However, it may be that the glass might flex when the inside and outside temps are different. Possibly dirt on the window may be a factor. I have do idea yet if this would cause trouble.

Comments are welcome any of this?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi, I don't have any input to your questions but I was curious to see an image of your observatory with the wind screen from the description.
 
The problem with window panes are other optical qualities (the big problem is not transparency but that they aren't flat, not coated, introduce color errors etc.) compared with optics. One could use optical quality glass but that would be very expensive.

Many years ago a guy in Kalix in northern Sweden built an observatory with a removable Mylar "window" so that he could observe when the temperature outside is -40 degrees C or colder. Mylar can have quite decent optical quality (see http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40680382?uid=3738984&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21102282123167 ).
 
Thanks. Yes, I recall the mylar approach.

As it turns out, my question is defunct. A circuit card that controls the shutter is more limited than I thought.

I have no photo of the wind screen in the proper position. I am providing one when it was out of the box that contained it.
 

Attachments

  • LanphierWindScreen 005.jpg
    LanphierWindScreen 005.jpg
    48.6 KB · Views: 423
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top