Show how the Boltzmann entropy is derived from the Gibbs entropy for equilibrium

zi-lao-lan
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show how the Boltzmann entropy is derived from the Gibbs entropy for systems in equilibrium.


Homework Equations



Gibbs entropy S= - \int \rho(p,q) (ln \rho(p,q)) dpdq
where \rho(p,q) is the probability distribution

Boltzmann entropy S= ln\Omega
where \Omega is the number of microstates in a given macrostate.


The Attempt at a Solution



1. Well, when the system is in equilibrium (ie when the Boltzmann entropy can be used) all microstates have equal probability. So this means that each microstate has a probability of 1/\Omega and the probability distribution \rho will have a constant value regardless of what p and q are.

2. I tried putting \rho=1/\Omega and subbing it into the Gibb's equation

S= - \int 1/\Omega (ln \1/\Omega) d\Omega<br /> using d\Omega since we want to add up over all the microstates and there are <br /> \Omega of them. But I can see that this won&#039;t give me the Boltzmann entropy.<br /> <br /> Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your problem is in setting dp dq = d\Omega, because with omega, you mean a fixed number, not a variable! It is clearer in this manner:

- \int \rho \ln \rho dp dq = - \int \frac{1}{\Omega} \ln \frac{1}{\Omega} dp dq = \left( - \frac{1}{\Omega} \ln \frac{1}{\Omega} \right) \int dp dq = \left( \frac{1}{\Omega} \ln \Omega \right) \Omega = \ln \Omega
 
Thanks for the reply :) But I'm still not sure how you get to the last step.

That means the the integral of dpdp = - omega, but I can't see why that is.

Is it something to do with normalising it?
 
ln(1/Ω)= ln1-lnΩ lol
 
Well, in a discrete system, omega is the number of microstates, but we're working with a continuous system here: then omega is the phase space volume, by which I mean the "volume" in (p,q)-space formed by all the available (p,q)-points. I think it's just defined that way actually.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top