Show that the following force is conservative

  • Thread starter Thread starter nbram87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining if the force represented by the components Fx = K(2x + y) and Fy = K(x + 2y) is conservative. Participants highlight that the curl of the force must be zero for it to be conservative, and the calculation shows that the curl is indeed zero regardless of the value of the constant K. K is clarified as a scaling constant that affects the magnitude of the force but does not influence the conservation property. Additionally, it is suggested that demonstrating the work done along any closed path is zero could also confirm the force's conservativeness. Ultimately, the curl calculation confirms that the force is conservative, with K being irrelevant to this determination.
nbram87
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Fx = K(2x + y), Fy = K(x + 2y)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I think what is confusing me is that it is two different forces (Fx and Fy). I know that the curl has to be zero for it to be conservative, and I am assuming I will have to figure out a value for the constant K for that too happen.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fx and Fy represent two components of a vector, so they describe a vector field. It might be written as:

## \vec{F} = Fx\;\hat{i} + Fy\;\hat{j} ##

How would you form the curl of that?
 
I think that is one thing that is confusing me. How else could you determine that the force is conservative? Would you have to determine the work done by both Fx and Fy are equal to 0?
 
nbram87 said:
I think that is one thing that is confusing me. How else could you determine that the force is conservative? Would you have to determine the work done by both Fx and Fy are equal to 0?

You could show that the work done in moving a particle along any closed path is zero (start at point P, traverse all possible paths (!) ending again at point P). The curl looks like the easiest approach.
 
When you do the curl of Fx and Fy, I think the constant K becomes useless because it equals to zero. What is the meaning of K in the problem then?
 
nbram87 said:
When you do the curl of Fx and Fy, I think the constant K becomes useless because it equals to zero. What is the meaning of K in the problem then?

I don't understand your meaning. How does K become zero? Can you show your curl calculation?
 
Curl = d/dx(Fy) i - d/dy (Fx) j
= d/dx [K(x + 2y)] + d/dy [K(2x + y)]
= K(1+ 0) - K (0+1)
= 0
So K - K = 0?
 
nbram87 said:
Curl = d/dx(Fy) i - d/dy (Fx) j
= d/dx [K(x + 2y)] + d/dy [K(2x + y)]
= K(1+ 0) - K (0+1)
= 0
So K - K = 0?

That tells you that the curl is zero no matter what value K has.
 
Is it correct? Is my calculation of the curl and the value of K being meaningless correct?
 
  • #10
nbram87 said:
Is it correct? Is my calculation of the curl and the value of K being meaningless correct?

The curl calculation result is correct. K is not "meaningless" (it's a scaling constant for the magnitude of the force, and likely makes the force equation units balance). It simply turns out to be irrelevant to the question of conservation.
 
  • #11
Ok thank you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
5K
Back
Top