Show two lines are parallel & find equation for their plane

jheld
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the two lines:
L1: x = t - 3; y = 1 - 2t; z = 2t + 5..
L2: x = 4 - 2s; y = 4s + 3; z = 6 - 4s... (I changed the t's to s's for L2)
are parallel, and find an equation for the plane that contains them.


Homework Equations


A(x - x0) + B(y - y0) + C(z - z0) = 0 : equation of a plane;
Set each variable (x, y, z) equal for each line, and if the equations don't match up with the found s's and t's, then the two lines are not going to intersect, or just look to see if the directional vectors (i.e. t's and s's) are scalar multiples of each other.


The Attempt at a Solution


I found that the lines directional vectors were scalar multiples of each other, thus proving that they are parallel. I could show this a couple of other ways, but this satisfies the first question.

As far as finding the equation for the plane containing the two lines, here is where I get stuck.

When I picture it in my head, I see each of the normal vectors pointing to the other line, respectively, which makes perfect sense. But from there, I don't see the connection that I need to make in order to find both 1)the vector for the equation and 2) the initial x,y,z point.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
L1: x = t - 3; y = 1 - 2t; z = 2t + 5..
L2: x = 4 - 2s; y = 4s + 3; z = 6 - 4s

One vector = <1,-2,2>
Other vector can be P2-P1.

There is no unique normal vector for one line. You need two non-parallel vectors to get a unique normal for them.
 
The first parallel vector to the line L1 is <1,-2,2> and the vector parallel to the line L2 is <-2,4,-4>. The lines are parallel if the first vector is scalar multiple of the other, i.e:
λ(1,-2,2)=(-2,4,-4)
As we can see λ=-2

For the second one, find three points from the lines and you will find the plane.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
12K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top