Showing a strange wavefunction satisfies the TDSE.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the wavefunction φ(x,t) = ei(ax-bt)ψ(x-vt, t) satisfies the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE) for a free particle. The key conditions for this to hold are that a = ħa²/2m and v = ħa/m. Participants express difficulty in taking the partial derivative of φ with respect to time and applying the product rule effectively. Specifically, there is confusion about relating ∂ψ(x-vt, t)/∂t to ∂ψ(x,t)/∂t. The goal is to show that ∂φ/∂t equals Hφ/iħ, confirming that φ satisfies the TDSE.
Robsta
Messages
88
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The wavefunction ψ(x,t) obeys the time-dependent Schrodinger equation for a free particle of mass m moving in one dimension.

Show that a second wavefunction φ(x,t) = ei(ax-bt)ψ(x-vt , t) obeys the same time dependent schrodinger equation, provided a = ħa2/2m and v = ħa/m

Homework Equations



The time dependent schrodinger equation is iħ∂φ/∂t = Hφ

Hφ = -ħ2/2m * ∂2φ/∂x2

The Attempt at a Solution



Taking the partial derivative of φ with respect to t, and using the product rule, you have to take ∂ψ(x-vt, t)/∂t and I'm not sure how to do this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Robsta said:

Homework Statement


The wavefunction ψ(x,t) obeys the time-dependent Schrodinger equation for a free particle of mass m moving in one dimension.

Show that a second wavefunction φ(x,t) = ei(ax-bt)ψ(x-vt , t) obeys the same time dependent schrodinger equation, provided a = ħa2/2m and v = ħa/m

Homework Equations



The time dependent schrodinger equation is iħ∂φ/∂t = Hφ

Hφ = -ħ2/2m * ∂2φ/∂x2

The Attempt at a Solution



Taking the partial derivative of φ with respect to t, and using the product rule, you have to take ∂ψ(x-vt, t)/∂t and I'm not sure how to do this.
Which thing are you having trouble with? the product rule? or taking a partial derivative?
 
I guess it's taking the partial derivative. I don't know how I can relate ∂ψ(x-vt, t)/∂t to ∂ψ(x,t)/∂t if that's what needs doing.
 
I've taken ∂φ/∂t and I'm trying to show it equals Hφ/iħ because then φ satisfies the TDSE.

∂φ/∂t = (-iħa2/2m)ei(ax-bt)ψ(x-vt, t) + ei(ax-bt)∂ψ(x-vt, t)/∂t
But I can't really deal with the second term of that eqn
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top