Showing a vector field is imcompressible

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of showing that a vector field is incompressible, specifically addressing the separation of components in the vector field. Participants clarify that the numerator of the vector field is represented as the vector r (bold) and its magnitude as r (non-bold), where r is defined as r = xi + yj + zk. The confusion arises from the treatment of the magnitude, which is not a constant but rather a function of the coordinates x, y, and z. The correct interpretation is crucial for understanding the incompressibility condition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields and their components
  • Familiarity with vector notation and magnitude
  • Knowledge of the product and chain rules in calculus
  • Basic principles of incompressibility in fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical properties of vector fields in three dimensions
  • Learn about the divergence of vector fields and its implications for incompressibility
  • Explore the application of the product and chain rules in vector calculus
  • Investigate examples of incompressible flow in fluid dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering, particularly those focusing on fluid dynamics and vector calculus.

question dude
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=455997&d=1440616258.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



As you can see, the solution is shown just below the question.

Essentially, I don't understand how the x, y and z component of the vector field has been separated because the numerator of the vector field's fraction is: (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(1/2)

It seems like they've just taken x^2 out and square rooted it to get 'x', but you can't do that, can you?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
question dude said:

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=455997&d=1440616258.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



As you can see, the solution is shown just below the question.

Essentially, I don't understand how the x, y and z component of the vector field has been separated because the numerator of the vector field's fraction is: (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(1/2)

It seems like they've just taken x^2 out and square rooted it to get 'x', but you can't do that, can you?

That isn't what they have done. The numerator is bold faced ##\bf{r}## and the denominator is ##r##. The first is the vector and the second its magnitude. r = xi + yj + zk.
 
LCKurtz said:
That isn't what they have done. The numerator is bold faced ##\bf{r}## and the denominator is ##r##. The first is the vector and the second its magnitude. r = xi + yj + zk.

Do I treat the non-bold r as a constant?

If sub in bold r, I get:

G = [(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^0.5 ] / 4*pi*r^3
 
question dude said:
Do I treat the non-bold r as a constant?

If sub in bold r, I get:

G = [(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^0.5 ] / 4*pi*r^3

I just noticed in your graphic under (b) they have ##{\bf r} = \sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}## That should not have been a bold face r. The bold face r represents the vector and the plain r its magnitude, which is not constant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K