Showing that an inequality is true

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
Poster has been reminded that showing their work on schoolwork problems is mandatory at the PF

Homework Statement


Suppose that ##N \in \mathbb{N}## and that ##(s_n)## is a nonnegative sequence. Prove that ##\displaystyle \frac{s_{N+1} + s_{N+2} + \cdots + s_n}{n} \le \sup \{s_n ~:~ n > N \}##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I need help explaining why this is true. Supposedly it is obvious, but I can't quite see it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have all ##s_k \le \mathcal{S} :=\sup\{s_n\, : \,n> N\}## for all ##k>N##.
Now count the summands on the left, each smaller than ##\mathcal{S}##, so ##M## many of them are smaller than?
 
  • Like
Likes nuuskur and Mr Davis 97
Mr Davis 97 said:

Homework Statement


Suppose that ##N \in \mathbb{N}## and that ##(s_n)## is a nonnegative sequence. Prove that ##\displaystyle \frac{s_{N+1} + s_{N+2} + \cdots + s_n}{n} \le \sup \{s_n ~:~ n > N \}##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I need help explaining why this is true. Supposedly it is obvious, but I can't quite see it...
You have to show some effort. Once you do, you may see it...
 
Well, if s_n is a diverging sequence, the claim is trivially true. Suppose the sequence converges, then it's bounded. Can an arithmetic mean of some n consecutive elements in the sequence exceed that bound? Any bound (hint hint, the smallest bound), for that matter.

The elements can also be picked arbitrarily, they don't have to be consecutive. The claim will still hold.

One can generalise even further and state a similar claim for arbitrary sequences, not just nonnegative ones.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top