SI units for Heat transfer equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the correct units for the heat transfer equation involving temperature change over time and spatial dimensions. The user is trying to reconcile the units on both sides of the equation, specifically questioning the role of thermal resistivity "k." There is confusion regarding whether "k" represents thermal resistivity or thermal diffusivity, with references to external sources for clarification. Participants suggest that a factor of meters may be necessary to correct the units, and emphasize the importance of consulting authoritative literature or class notes for accurate definitions. The conversation highlights the complexities of unit conversions in heat transfer equations.
jeff1evesque
Messages
312
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am trying to get the units to match up on both sides. \frac{\partial T}{\partial t} = \frac{\nabla ^{2} T}{k} = \frac{1}{K}(\frac{\partial ^2 T}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial ^2 T}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial ^2 T}{\partial z^2}}), where k is the thermal resistivity.

The Attempt at a Solution


By searching all over the web, I've found that thermal resistivity "k" has units of \frac{Kelvins}{W}.

Therefore,

\frac{\partial T}{\partial t} = \frac{Kelvins}{s} \neq (\frac{W}{Kelvins})*(\frac{Kelvins}{m^2}). Could someone help me correct the units.Thanks,JL
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LowlyPion said:
This may be useful:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_resistivity

I think there needs to be a factor of m added to your statement.

Oh I see it now, but what about the unit for seconds "s"?
 
Last edited:
k is not the thermal resistivity, it's the inverse http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_diffusivity" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mapes said:
k is not the thermal resistivity, it's the inverse http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_diffusivity" .

Are you sure? I mean the units do infact check out if you are correct- but according to my class notes they've referred it to thermal resistivity.

Thanks a lot.

JL
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It doesn't matter if I'm sure. :smile: Check the literature; ask your teacher for a reference.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top