Signal Power Distribution Upon Resampling

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effects of resampling a 25 Hz signal first at 100 Hz and then at 60 Hz, highlighting the appearance of aliasing in the frequency domain. When analyzed through the Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT), the original 25 Hz signal shows spikes at 25 Hz, 75 Hz, 125 Hz, and 175 Hz, which transform into 5 Hz, 15 Hz, and 25 Hz signals in the 60 Hz system. According to Parseval's theorem, the total power of the original signal is equal to the sum of the powers of the aliased frequencies in the new system. The user seeks a closed-form expression to determine the power distribution among these frequencies but struggles with fitting the signals correctly. Clarification is requested on the Fourier transform process to better understand the power distribution.
dwlink
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have a real 25 Hz signal that is sampled at 100 Hz without any anti-aliasing filters.

Taking the DFT results in a series of spikes 25 Hz, 75 Hz, 125 Hz, 175 Hz etc.

Now suppose the 25 Hz signal after it enters the 100 Hz system now enters a 60 Hz system. If we take the DFT now, we see the same repeating spikes as before, however now they are in sets of three.

For a 60 Hz system, the original 25 Hz signal will look like 25 Hz, but the 75 Hz (first alias) will appear as a 15Hz signal to the 60 Hz system. The 2nd alias at 125 Hz will appear as a 5 Hz signal to the 60 Hz system.

Now if we look at the signal power in the 25 Hz signal from the system that samples at 100 Hz and add up the power of the 5 Hz, 15 Hz, and 25 Hz spikes from the 60 Hz system - we will see they are equal according to Parseval's theorem.

But, how exactly do I figure out a closed form way of expressing what fraction of the power goes to each of the individual frequencies?

I tried to fit the signal sin(2*pi*25*n/100) to
a1*sin(2*pi*5*n/60) + a2*sin(2*pi*15*n/60) + a3*sin(2*pi*25*n/60) but had no luck when trying to fit the signals (yes I know the power and amplitude coefficients will be different).

Am I doing the Fourier transform wrong? Can anyone point me to a reference that discusses this topic? Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
dwlink said:
Now suppose the 25 Hz signal after it enters the 100 Hz system now enters a 60 Hz system.
Sorry, we can't answer your question because we don't know what that sentence means. Please clarify.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top