Why is the concept of dipole moment significant in physics?

AI Thread Summary
The concept of dipole moment is significant in physics because it provides a simplified model for understanding complex charge distributions, particularly as the dipole term often represents the second largest contribution in multipole expansions after the monopole term. This simplification allows for effective approximations of electric fields and potentials in various scenarios, including continuous charge distributions. Additionally, the dipole moment plays a crucial role in the behavior of atoms and molecules in electromagnetic fields, influencing interactions in both classical and quantum physics. It is also fundamental in applications such as antenna radiation and the effects of dielectrics in Maxwell's equations. Understanding dipole moments is essential for grasping the underlying principles of electric fields and potential energy in physics.
kiwibird4
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was wondering why dipoles are singled out as a separate section in my physics textbook. For instance, after discussing electric fields the textbook specifies what a dipole is, dipole moment, and the electric field for a dipole. Finding the e-field for a dipole would be the same as finding an e field at a point due to two separate opposite charges though. Why is the concept of a dipole singled out? Is a dipole supposed to be treated as a singular system that has this separation of equal charge or can one think of is as two random charges which are separated that happen to be the same magnitude of charge.

Also (sorry for so much) what is the dipole moment telling us? I understand it is the charge and the length of the separation multiplied to give us this vector quantity, but why would that even be important or some helpful thing to calculate (other than a stepping stone for equations that use the moment like torque with E cross moment and potential energy )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kiwibird4 said:
Finding the e-field for a dipole would be the same as finding an e field at a point due to two separate opposite charges though.
It's not that easy if the charge distribution is continuous.
kiwibird4 said:
Why is the concept of a dipole singled out?
Given an arbitrary charge distribution, the fields and potential associated to this charge can be expanded into multipole terms, with the dipole term in most cases being the second largest contribution after the monopole term. Therefore, truncating the expansion up to the dipole term will usually yield a good approximation to the actual fields and potential. Beside this, the field due to an oscillating dipole will serve as a benchmark of understanding of antenna radiation. The importance of dipole moment also crosses over the boundary between classical and quantum physics In particular, dipole moment of an atom or molecules determines the behavior of the atom/molecule when interacting with elecromagnetic field.
 
Last edited:
. It is used extensively in discussing the affects on the local electric field of a dielectric and in Maxwell's equations in substances.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top