Simple circuit analysis w/ voltage sources - MasteringPhysics wrong?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a circuit analysis problem involving four resistors and both known and unknown voltage sources. The original poster believes that the MasteringPhysics solution is incorrect, having shown their calculations to support their claim. However, feedback suggests that the issue may stem from a misidentification of a resistor's value, specifically confusing a 1.0Ω resistor for a 1kΩ resistor. To resolve the problem, it is recommended to apply Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) to analyze the circuit in both current directions. This highlights the importance of double-checking component values in circuit analysis.
resigned
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We are given a simple circuit with 4 resistors, a known voltage source, and an unknown voltage source. The photo is below in my solution attempt.

Homework Equations


V=IR, R(parallel)=(1/R1+1/R2)^-1

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the voltage drop over the given resistor, then used that voltage to find the current through the other resistor in parallel, which gave me the total current through the circuit.

http://imgur.com/HtJootR

My problem is I am pretty sure MasteringPhysics is wrong here. I included all of my work finding my answer, and then tested their answer to show that it is wrong. I am confident in my work but was hoping you could look it over before I go make a dodo of myself to my instructor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


resigned said:

Homework Statement


We are given a simple circuit with 4 resistors, a known voltage source, and an unknown voltage source. The photo is below in my solution attempt.


Homework Equations


V=IR, R(parallel)=(1/R1+1/R2)^-1


The Attempt at a Solution


I found the voltage drop over the given resistor, then used that voltage to find the current through the other resistor in parallel, which gave me the total current through the circuit.

http://imgur.com/HtJootR

My problem is I am pretty sure MasteringPhysics is wrong here. I included all of my work finding my answer, and then tested their answer to show that it is wrong. I am confident in my work but was hoping you could look it over before I go make a dodo of myself to my instructor.

Their answers look fine to me.

Write out the voltage drops across each resistor. You know that they will potential drops in the direction of current flow, and that current flow can be either clockwise or counterclockwise. Perform a "KVL walk" around the loop assuming that the current flows in one direction and solve for the required Vba. Then do the same again assuming the current is flowing in the other direction.

By the way, that's a 1.0Ω resistor on the bottom, not a 1kΩ resistor.
 


gneill said:
By the way, that's a 1.0Ω resistor on the bottom, not a 1kΩ resistor.

Consarn it. I think that's the source of my problems. I didn't notice it had different units to the rest of them.
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'

Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'

The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
View full post »
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'

Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'

I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
View full post »

Similar threads

Ohm's Law - Finding Source Voltage
Replies
3
Views
1K
Current through an inductor as a function of time
Replies
10
Views
413
Network Analysis, Kirchhoff's Laws, changing current source to voltage
Replies
4
Views
1K
Nodal analysis of this circuit with 2 sources and 4 resistors
Replies
12
Views
2K
Understanding example in Wikipedia entry for open circuit voltage
Replies
3
Views
2K
Calculating the voltage across capacitors and resistors with switches
Replies
2
Views
785
RCL series circuit analysis: Damping Constant
Replies
1
Views
687
Understanding Total Voltage in Parallel Circuits
Replies
6
Views
1K
Calculation of current in driven series RLC circuit
Replies
8
Views
2K
What does a Zener diode do in a circuit with non-ideal voltage source?
Replies
3
Views
955

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top