Simple Circuit Question (KVL/KCL)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Novark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a circuit problem using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL). The user initially struggles to relate voltage (v) and current (i) in their equations. They realize that the voltage drop across a 2-ohm resistor is equal to i multiplied by 2 ohms, which simplifies their calculations. After correcting their arithmetic, they conclude that the current i equals 4. The conversation highlights the importance of careful arithmetic in circuit analysis.
Novark
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
[Solved]

Homework Statement



4017773043_4297587691_o.jpg


Homework Equations



KCL, KVL, Ohms Law

The Attempt at a Solution



6 = i + (i/4) + (v/8)

I just can't get another equation that relates v & i.

Any suggestions? Am I going about this the right way?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The branch with the 2 ohm resistor tells you that the voltage drop across it is given by i*(2 ohms), which, from the way the circuit is laid out, must also be equal to v.
 
we know that the equivalent resistance of the io/4 branch is 4 times that in the 2 ohm resistor, because 1/4 the current flows. So it's easy to redraw the circuit using an 8 ohm resistor in place of that branch, and that makes it all nice and easy.
 
cepheid said:
The branch with the 2 ohm resistor tells you that the voltage drop across it is given by i*(2 ohms), which, from the way the circuit is laid out, must also be equal to v.

If that's the case, then won't I get:

6 = i + (i/4) + (2i/8) = (5i/2)
Which would give: i = 12/5.

Am I missing something?
 
Bad arithmetic:

i = 4i/4

i/4 = i/4

2i/8 = i/4

so the sum is:

4i/4 + i/4 + i/4 = 6i/4 = 3i/2

if 3i/2 = 6, then 3i = 12, and i = 4.
 
cepheid said:
Bad arithmetic:

i = 4i/4

i/4 = i/4

2i/8 = i/4

so the sum is:

4i/4 + i/4 + i/4 = 6i/4 = 3i/2

if 3i/2 = 6, then 3i = 12, and i = 4.

Ah, that's right. Not sure how I made such a silly mistake.
Thank you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top