Simple Conceptual Question about Forces.

  • Thread starter Thread starter wesDOT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual Forces
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on analyzing forces acting on a beam leaning against a frictionless wall, attached to a pin at its base. Key forces identified include the weight of the beam, the normal force from the pin, and the normal force from the wall. The concept of equilibrium is emphasized, particularly that a frictionless wall does not exert a force parallel to the wall, and that the pin can exert both horizontal and vertical force components. Understanding these principles is crucial for correctly drawing Free Body Diagrams (FBD) in static equilibrium scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Free Body Diagrams (FBD)
  • Knowledge of static equilibrium principles
  • Familiarity with force components in two dimensions
  • Basic concepts of frictionless surfaces in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in physics
  • Learn to construct Free Body Diagrams for various structures
  • Explore the effects of friction on force analysis
  • Investigate the role of normal forces in static systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, engineers, and anyone involved in structural analysis or mechanics who seeks to deepen their understanding of force interactions in static systems.

wesDOT
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I am trying to draw an FBD for a beam leaning against a frictionless wall attached to a pin at the bottom end. The forces present would be the weight, normal force of the pin attached to the floor and the normal force of the wall.

When determining forces that are present, can I remove the object that is exerting the force on my primary object and then anaylze the logical motion that my primary object would follow?

For the case above, if I remove the frictionless wall, the beam would fall down and to the right? Wouldn't that mean there is a force that acts upwards and left? Same with the pin. If I removed the pin and floor, the bottom end of the beam would fall to the right and downwards, which would make me think that the force from the pin acts upwards and to the left.

My reasoning is wrong. So how would I analyze the forces at the pin and the wall?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your reasoning is wrong.

When you are told that the wall is frictionless, that means that there is no force exerted on the body parallel to the wall. Such a force would have to come from friction, and there is none. Therefore, you know the direction of the contact force at the wall.

At the pin, there can be force components in both directions, horiz & vert.

See if this wll get you going.
 
If the wall is frictionless, can there be a downward force acting on the beam at the wall? If the wall exerts a rightward horizontal force on the beam, what force must balance it for the equilibrium condition?
 
That makes sense. I knew there was something i was missing. Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
660
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K