Simple Conceptual Question about Forces.

  • Thread starter Thread starter wesDOT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual Forces
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing forces acting on a beam leaning against a frictionless wall, supported by a pin at its base. Participants explore the implications of removing the wall and pin on the beam's motion and the forces involved.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the forces acting on the beam by considering the effects of removing the wall and pin. Questions are raised about the direction of forces and the implications of a frictionless wall.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide clarification on the nature of forces at the wall and the pin, noting the absence of friction and the implications for equilibrium. There is acknowledgment of a misunderstanding in the original reasoning, with guidance offered to help clarify the concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of force diagrams and equilibrium conditions, with specific attention to the definitions of frictionless surfaces and the resulting force interactions.

wesDOT
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I am trying to draw an FBD for a beam leaning against a frictionless wall attached to a pin at the bottom end. The forces present would be the weight, normal force of the pin attached to the floor and the normal force of the wall.

When determining forces that are present, can I remove the object that is exerting the force on my primary object and then anaylze the logical motion that my primary object would follow?

For the case above, if I remove the frictionless wall, the beam would fall down and to the right? Wouldn't that mean there is a force that acts upwards and left? Same with the pin. If I removed the pin and floor, the bottom end of the beam would fall to the right and downwards, which would make me think that the force from the pin acts upwards and to the left.

My reasoning is wrong. So how would I analyze the forces at the pin and the wall?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your reasoning is wrong.

When you are told that the wall is frictionless, that means that there is no force exerted on the body parallel to the wall. Such a force would have to come from friction, and there is none. Therefore, you know the direction of the contact force at the wall.

At the pin, there can be force components in both directions, horiz & vert.

See if this wll get you going.
 
If the wall is frictionless, can there be a downward force acting on the beam at the wall? If the wall exerts a rightward horizontal force on the beam, what force must balance it for the equilibrium condition?
 
That makes sense. I knew there was something i was missing. Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K