Simple gravity question no math involved

  • Thread starter Thread starter nivush1991
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the differing signs of acceleration for a bouncing ball and gravity. The acceleration of gravity is typically negative, while the ball's acceleration can be positive depending on the position of the measurement detector. When the detector is placed above the ball, it measures acceleration in a way that flips the sign. To align both accelerations as negative, the detector should be positioned below the ball. The key takeaway is that the direction of measurement affects the sign of the acceleration values.
nivush1991
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement
This is the bouncing ball lab. My question is when and why is the sign (-/+) different in the acceleration of gravity and the bouncing ball.

For example when the ball was in the air, it's acceleration was approx. 10 m/s2, which is very close numerically to the acceleration of gravity which is -9.8 m/s2. but why are the signs different. why is the acceleration of the ball positive if the accelereation of the force that's pulling the ball down (gravity) negative?

thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must be measuring distances so that larger numbers are lower than higher numbers. Flip the meter stick around.
 
thanks a lot, definatly inspired me to write my answer.

i wrote "The signs are different between the acceleration of gravity and that of the bouncing ball because of the placement of the position detector. We placed it above the ball which would have it acting against gravity thus flipping the signs around. In order for the acceleration of gravity and the bouncing ball to be the same (both negative) we would need to place the detector on the ground beneath the ball because that’s how gravity works."
 
What's important is not where the 'detector' is located. It's what direction it points. For g to be negative, larger numbers should correspond to larger elevations.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top