Simple harmonic motion acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the maximum acceleration in simple harmonic motion, particularly in the context of damping. The acceleration formula is provided, highlighting that it depends on both displacement and velocity. There is a debate about why maximum acceleration occurs at point R instead of point P, despite P having greater displacement. The presence of damping complicates the situation, as it introduces a velocity-dependent term that affects the overall acceleration. The participant expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their answers, suggesting potential errors in understanding the underlying concepts.
pyman999
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


10630a3ad979be4a0d95323fe944ac7c.png


Homework Equations


acceleration = -(2*pi*f)^2 * x, where f is the frequency and x is the displacement from equilibrium.

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought the acceleration would be greatest when the displacement from equilibrium is greatest, so at point P, but the answer is at point R and I'm not sure why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re relevant equation: since there is damping, the expression for the acceleration is a little different: generally the damping force is taken to be proportional to the speed, so there is a term in the force ##-\beta v## and we write $$ m a + \beta v + k x = 0 $$ so that $$a = -{\beta \over m} v - {k\over m} x$$

Re where magnitude of a is maximum: I agree with you. Both at P and R |v| = 0 and |x| is bigger at P.
 
BvU said:
Re relevant equation: since there is damping, the expression for the acceleration is a little different: generally the damping force is taken to be proportional to the speed, so there is a term in the force ##-\beta v## and we write $$ m a + \beta v + k x = 0 $$ so that $$a = -{\beta \over m} v - {k\over m} x$$

Re where magnitude of a is maximum: I agree with you. Both at P and R |v| = 0 and |x| is bigger at P.

I'm fairly sure the answers I have been given for this question are wrong then, as I'm also getting weird results for later parts, thanks.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top