Simple harmonic motion and central forces.

WhataRecch
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Assuming Earth to be a solid sphere, show that if a straight hole were drilled from pole to pole that a particel dropped would undergo simple harmonic motion. Show that the period of the oscillation depends only on the Earth's density and is independent of size. What is the period in hours?


Homework Equations



We have already done studying oscillations and this questions mainly pertains to central forces. The obvious equation I have in mind is F = GMm/(r^2) and I know somehow I have to do something that will lead to d2x/dt2 = constant*x


The Attempt at a Solution



Something tells me this problem is extremely simple. But I don't understand how to do it. I've reached a bit of a dead end. The equation for the force that is exterted on the particle doesn't display shm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that:
1. a particle inside such a hole will only be attracted by the gravitational pull of that spherical part of the Earth which lies BELOW the particle;
2. use 'mass = volume x density' for that part of the mass of the Earth;
3. take the particle to be at some displacement x in a direction away from the cente of the Earth;
4. use f(net) = ma for the particle in the direction of displacement x;
 
If you follow grzz advice you should find that the force on the mass is proportional to r which means the mass will undergo SHM
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top