Simple Harmonic Motion Equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
In simple harmonic motion, applying a continuous downward force on a mass hanging from a spring alters the system's equilibrium position, establishing a new point. If the force is not continuous and merely adds energy, such as a brief push, the original equilibrium remains unchanged. The discussion clarifies the distinction between continuous force application and transient energy addition. Participants acknowledge the confusion and refine their understanding of equilibrium in relation to external forces. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately defining forces in the context of harmonic motion.
genevievelily
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I am a little confused with this subject. If you have a mass hanging from a spring, there is a specific equilibrium point, but what if you apply a force downwards on the mass, will this have an effect on the equilibrium position or will it remain the same?

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the force is applied continuously, it would be added to the current downward force of the mass, and (Edit) the system would establish a new equilibrium point. Is that what you meant?
 
Last edited:
My first reply was poor to incorrect. I think when you said apply a force, you meant adding energy to the system, like pushing down on the mass. That would not change the equilibrium point. Sorry for being too hasty.:blushing:
 
yes that is what I meant, thanks!
 
genevievelily said:
yes that is what I meant, thanks!

My post #3 crossed paths with your reply at about the same time. Please read!
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top