Simple Harmonic Motion- From Uniform Circular Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between angular frequency (W), frequency (f), and the period (T) in simple harmonic motion. The confusion arises from the different forms of the equations provided by the instructor and the textbook. It is clarified that W can be expressed as W = 2π√(k/m), where k is the spring constant and m is the mass, while T can be derived as T = 2π√(m/k). The distinction between measuring frequency in radians per second versus Hertz is also explained, noting that 1 Hz equals one cycle per second, which corresponds to 2π radians. Understanding these conversions helps clarify the equations and their applications in simple harmonic motion.
chantalprince
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I don't have a homework question exactly, but I need help with an equation please.


Angular frequency: W= 2 pi/T = 2(pi)(f) f= frequency

And- W = square root of (k/m) k = spring constant m= mass

So, wouldn't T = 2 pi / square root of (k/m) ??



My instructor has given us the following equations in class a few times. I cannot figure out what the heck is going on!

W = (2 pi) x the square root of(k/m)
T = (2 pi) x the square root of (m/k) -------> m/k this time

Any help is appreciated. I am so confused right now.





Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is simply because of the fact that:

\frac{1}{\frac{a}{b}}=\frac{b}{a}
 
Ok- but in the book it gives: W = sq. root of (k/m)

Instructor gives: W = 2pi x sq. root (k/m)

Whats with the 2 pi??

Thanks-
 
What's the difference between measuring angular frequency in Hz and measuring frequency in radians per second? That might give you an idea where the conversion comes from.
 
Ok...I'll sit down with that thought. So, either one works right? They are the same thing??
 
Ah I see what you're getting at now. There's a mistake in the equation for frequency:

\omega_{n} = \sqrt{\frac {k}{m}} (1)

where frequency is in radians per second.

But what if you want to express the frequency in Hertz? Well, we know that 1 Hz is equal to one cycle per second. In the case of circular motion, one cycle is equal to 2\pi radians.

So to convert from radians per second to Hertz, one must divide by 2\pi. Hence:

\omega = \frac {1}{2\pi} \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} (2)

where frequency is now in Hertz.

Now let's express this in terms of the period of one cycle, T. Bear in mind that if you were simply to reciprocate the expression for frequency when expressed in radians per second (equation 1), you would be stating the length of time of rotation for one radian alone. Hence you have to multiply the expression by 2\pi now to obtain the period for a single cycle. This is now the same equation as you would obtain by reciprocating equation 2.

Hope this helps.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top