Simple Harmonic Motion Lab Question: Investigating the Period-Mass Relationship

  • Thread starter Thread starter jonesy3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic Lab
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a lab investigating the period-mass relationship in simple harmonic motion using a spring-mass system. The participant collected data on various masses and their corresponding periods of oscillation but found discrepancies when comparing experimental results to theoretical predictions. Concerns were raised about the accuracy of the spring constant calculation and the use of units, specifically the need to convert grams to kilograms for proper SI unit application. Additionally, clarification was sought on how the displacement measurements were taken relative to the spring's equilibrium. The overall conclusion emphasizes the importance of correct unit usage and measurement methods to ensure accurate results in the experiment.
jonesy3
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A lab I'm assigned concerning simple harmonic motion uses a simple spring attached to a mass system...it asks me to "investigate the period-mass relationship. determine the period of oscillation of your system for several different masses. Verify that your data is consistent with the predicted period mass relationship "T=2pi sqrt of [(m+m(eff))/K] Construct a graph of (period)^2 vs mass. Justify your conclusions. Employ % difference calculations where appropriate.


Homework Equations


My data was
mass 50.95g, went down 2.1cm from equilibrium, period=3.22 sec
mass 70.95g, went down 2.8 cm from equil, period=3.8 sec
mass 100.95, went down 4.0 cm from equil, period=4.04 sec
mass 120.95g, went down 4.9cm from equil, period=4.9sec
mass 140.95g, went down 5.7cm from equil, period=5.7sec


The Attempt at a Solution



Using f=-kx, i found the avg spring constant to be 243.54. I need to find the period of oscillation for all of the masses using the equation above and compare that to the period of oscillation I got in the actual experiment. I tested it out... so T=2pi (square root[50.95/242.6])...gives me T^2=1.32 or T=1.14... this is no where near 3.22sec which was my actual experimental result. The lab says that you should be getting within 1% error...is my data just very inaccurate or am I doing something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jonesy3 said:

Homework Statement


A lab I'm assigned concerning simple harmonic motion uses a simple spring attached to a mass system...it asks me to "investigate the period-mass relationship. determine the period of oscillation of your system for several different masses. Verify that your data is consistent with the predicted period mass relationship "T=2pi sqrt of [(m+m(eff))/K] Construct a graph of (period)^2 vs mass. Justify your conclusions. Employ % difference calculations where appropriate.


Homework Equations


My data was
mass 50.95g, went down 2.1cm from equilibrium, period=3.22 sec
mass 70.95g, went down 2.8 cm from equil, period=3.8 sec
mass 100.95, went down 4.0 cm from equil, period=4.04 sec
mass 120.95g, went down 4.9cm from equil, period=4.9sec
mass 140.95g, went down 5.7cm from equil, period=5.7sec


The Attempt at a Solution



Using f=-kx, i found the avg spring constant to be 243.54. I need to find the period of oscillation for all of the masses using the equation above and compare that to the period of oscillation I got in the actual experiment. I tested it out... so T=2pi (square root[50.95/242.6])...gives me T^2=1.32 or T=1.14... this is no where near 3.22sec which was my actual experimental result. The lab says that you should be getting within 1% error...is my data just very inaccurate or am I doing something wrong?

What do you mean by went down x cm from equilibrium? Did you hang the mass and measured the new equilibrium point relative to the equilibrium of the unloaded spring, or did you measure the amplitude of the oscillation relative to the loaded equilibrium?
 
I'd have to say be careful with units. The value for spring constant you have obtained is certainly not Newtons per meter. In your calculation you've used grams instead of kilograms. I'd recommend sticking with SI units. Plus have you measured frequency or time period in your experiment?
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top