Does the Period of Simple Harmonic Motion Depend on Spring Constant and Mass?

AI Thread Summary
The period of simple harmonic motion (SHO) is determined by the spring constant (k) and the mass (m) of the oscillating body, as described by the equation ω=√(k/m). The amplitude of the motion does not affect the period, confirming that it remains constant regardless of how far the spring is stretched or compressed. The relationship between frequency (f) and angular frequency (ω) is established through the equation ω=2πf. Therefore, both the stiffness of the spring and the mass are critical factors in determining the period of SHO. Understanding these relationships is essential for analyzing oscillatory systems.
tahayassen
Messages
269
Reaction score
1
Period does not depend on amplitude. Correct?

I deduced this from the equations for simple harmonic motion:

ω=2πf
ω=√(k/m)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are correct.

The period of a SHO depends on the k value, i.e. stiffness of the spring, and the mass of the oscillating body as
\omega=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top