Simple Harmonic Motion Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a homework problem involving simple harmonic motion, specifically using the equation x = A cos(wt - phi). The user initially calculates time values t1 and t2, assuming a phase angle phi of zero, resulting in an implausible answer of over 40 seconds. Other participants point out that the amplitude (A) is 0.100m and the angular frequency (w) is 1.48 Hz, suggesting that the user's calculations may contain algebraic errors. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in the algebraic steps taken to solve for time, indicating that the logic and physical interpretation of the results are critical. The thread highlights the importance of correctly applying the equations and assumptions in simple harmonic motion problems.
FsLiu
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


316m72x.png

Homework Equations



x = A cos(wt-phi)

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the above equation for t, calculating values for t1 at -0.05 and t2 at 0.05, as well as assuming phase angle phi is zero, I get an answer of over 40 seconds.

I think I may be using the wrong equation or perhaps assuming the value of phi incorrectly. Help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What values are you using for that equation (i.e. what A and omega ['w']) ?
 
zhermes said:
What values are you using for that equation (i.e. what A and omega ['w']) ?

Those are both given in the original question, A=0.100m and w=2pi(period inverse) which turns out to be 1.48 Hz
 
I don't see how you could be getting > 40s; can you show us how you solved for t?
 
zhermes said:
I don't see how you could be getting > 40s; can you show us how you solved for t?

Yeah that's the problem, doesn't make sense logically/physically.

I used the equation x = A cos(wt-phi), assumed phi was zero and rearranged for time, t.

Then I did t1 at -0.05m and t2 at +0.05m and then took the difference as the time taken to go from point one to point 2.
 
There must be something wrong with your algebra, could you show your expressions for t
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top