Simple Harmonic Motion: Determine Velocity at t=0.250s

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a 39.8 g oscillating mass at t=0.250s using the position equation x(t) = (2.00cm)cos(5t - 4.00π). The correct formula for velocity is V_x = -ωA sin(ωt + φ), where the user initially miscalculated the velocity due to unit conversion errors. After clarification, it was noted that the velocity should be expressed in cm/s instead of m/s. The key takeaway is the importance of unit consistency in calculations. Understanding the relationship between velocity and position is crucial for solving harmonic motion problems effectively.
Moe*
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
_{}b]1. Homework Statement [/b)

The position of a 39.8 g oscillating mass is given by the equation x(t)= (2.00cm)cos(5t- 4.00\pi) where t is in seconds. Determine Velocity at t= 0.250s

M= 39.8 g
T= 1.2575 rad/s
K= 9.95e-1 N/m
initial postion= 2 cm

Homework Equations



V_{x}= -\omegaAsin(\omegat + \phi)

The Attempt at a Solution



the attempt i just substitued
V_{x}= -5 rad/s*2sin( 5.00(0.250)-4\pi)... but this didn't work and i don't understand why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
for the the equations posted its supposed to be V subscript x= wAsin(wt + phi) and x(t) = (2.00cm)cos(5t - 4pi)
 
Moe* said:
The position of a 39.8 g oscillating mass is given by the equation x(t)= (2.00cm)cos(5t- 4.00\pi) where t is in seconds. Determine Velocity at t= 0.250s

What is the basic relation connecting velocity and position of any particle? Use that.
 
Moe* said:
_{}b]1. Homework Statement [/b)

The position of a 39.8 g oscillating mass is given by the equation x(t)= (2.00cm)cos(5t- 4.00\pi) where t is in seconds. Determine Velocity at t= 0.250s

M= 39.8 g
T= 1.2575 rad/s
K= 9.95e-1 N/m
initial postion= 2 cm

Homework Equations



V_{x}= -\omegaAsin(\omegat + \phi)

The Attempt at a Solution



the attempt i just substitued
V_{x}= -5 rad/s*2sin( 5.00(0.250)-4\pi)... but this didn't work and i don't understand why?
it seems work to me...
 
Your right it does work, i guess I entered in the wrong units when i answered the question( m/s instead of cm/s).
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top