Simple harmonic oscillator- the probability density function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the probability density function for a simple harmonic oscillator. Participants explore various mathematical approaches and concepts related to the oscillator's motion, including time spent at different positions and the relationship between position and velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the probability density function should resemble a parabola, but the exact formula and derivation remain unclear.
  • One participant proposes that the probability is related to the time spent in a given interval, leading to the expression dP = 2*dt/T.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the particle spends most of its time at the amplitude extremes where its velocity is low.
  • Frímann expresses difficulty in deriving the probability density function from the suggested relationships, particularly in converting velocity as a function of time to a function of position.
  • There is a discussion about using trigonometric identities to express velocity as a function of position, with some participants confirming similar results through different methods.
  • One participant raises a concern about the integration yielding negative values for probability, questioning the validity of the resulting probability distribution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the exact form of the probability density function, and multiple approaches and interpretations are presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the importance of normalizing the probability distribution and the need to express velocity as a function of position, but these steps remain unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and researchers interested in the mathematical modeling of simple harmonic motion and the derivation of probability distributions in quantum mechanics.

trelek2
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
How to find the probability density function of a simple harmonic oscillator? I know that for one normal node is should be a parabola but what is the formula and how do we derive it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
trelek2 said:
How to find the probability density function of a simple harmonic oscillator? I know that for one normal node is should be a parabola but what is the formula and how do we derive it?

Probability is equal to the time spent in interval (x,x+dx) normed to total time it takes mass to run through entire available x space ( from -A to A, A is amplitude ). So you have

dP = 2*dt/T .

Take your dt from energy conservation law ( v = dx/dt ! ) and integrate from -A to A. IIRC your distribution should have two poles at amplitudes, maybe some pi somewhere ... don't know, do your math =) Let us know what have you found!

edit:
Your integration limits should not be from -A to A but over the range where you want to calculate probability of finding your mass! Upper integral will give you 1, of course.
 
Last edited:
You will find that although the particle average position is zero, the most of the time it spends at the ends where its velocity is small.

Bob.
 
I know that, I was more curious about the function p(x)...
 
I'm struggling with the same problem here. Trying to find the probability density function for a simple harmonic oscillator.

I'm having trouble deriving P from the information suggested here.

It was suggested that we should use:

dP = 2*dt/T

and the fact that

v = dx/dt

Now we have:

x(t) = Acos(ωt)

and

v(t) = -Aωsin(ωt)

Now if we integrate dP we get

P = int( 2/(T*v) dx)

But since I only have v(t), but not v(x), I'm not sure how to go about this.

I know that a(x) = -ω2x

but I'm not sure if that can be of any aid?

Anyone have a clue?

regards
Frímann
 
dreamspy said:
...

Now if we integrate dP we get

P = int( 2/(T*v) dx)

But since I only have v(t), but not v(x), I'm not sure how to go about this.

dx=vdt so P =2 int(dt)/T = 1.
 
Bob_for_short said:
dx=vdt so P =2 int(dt)/T = 1.

Which is what we started with ( dp = 2 dt/T ), with normalization added: P(-infinity < x < +infinity) = 1

But I'm supposed to find P as a function of x, which probably looks something like a parabola. Now isn't it neccesarry for me to substitute that dt with dx/v ?

Then I would need to define v as a function of x, right?

Regards
Frímann Kjerúlf
 
dreamspy said:
Now we have:

x(t) = Acos(ωt) and v(t) = -Aωsin(ωt)

Maybe Asin(ωt) = A[1-cos2(ωt)]1/2 = A[1-x2/A2]1/2, so you obtain v(x)?
 
Bob_for_short said:
Maybe Asin(ωt) = A[1-cos2(ωt)]1/2 = A[1-x2/A2]1/2, so you obtain v(x)?

Thats seems to be about right, although I don't understand how you got there :)

I got the same results doing:

Isolate x:

x(t) = Acos(ωt) => t(x) = arccos(x/A)/ω

differentiate t(x):

dt/dx = 1 / (A^2 - x^2)^1/2

which is equal to 1/v :

v(x)= dx/dt = (A^2 - x^2)^1/2

which is the same result you got.

Thanks :)
Frímann
 
  • #10
I used the trigonometry, but your way is also right.
 
  • #11
What is about a Probability density to find particle with amplitude A or -A?

Near point A and -A.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
I tried to solve for the functional form of the probability.
I set A = w = 1 and ignored 2/T for simplicity.

So, probability of finding oscillator at position x is proportional to the amount of time it spends at every dx---

i.e
Prob. prop to ...
int(dt) = int(dx/v)

v(x) = 1/(1-x^2)^1/2 (*There's two ways to get this--see post #8 and #9*)

Integration of 1/(1-x^2)^1/2 dx

yields Arcsin(x), which is negative when x is negative--->doesn't make sense as a probability distribution.

Any thoughts?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K