Simple Harmonics - Kind of wierd

  • Thread starter Thread starter kevinr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a harmonic motion problem involving a mass on a spring, specifically finding the position of the mass at t = 1.00s using the provided displacement equation. Initially, the user attempted to substitute the time directly into the equation but received an incorrect result. It was clarified that the calculations should be performed in radians rather than degrees, which resolved the issue. The correct position was confirmed to be obtained when using radians. The conversation highlights the importance of using the appropriate angle measurement in harmonic motion calculations.
kevinr
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Simple Harmonics - Kind of wierd

Homework Statement



Question:
A 1.30 kg mass on a spring has displacement as a function of time given by the equation:

x\left( t \right) = \left( {7.40\;{\rm{ cm}}} \right)\,\cos\:\left[ {\left( {4.16\;{\rm{ s}}^{ - 1} } \right)t - 2.42} \right].

Find the position of the mass at t = 1.00s.

Homework Equations



?

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so since this is a position equation, i figured that i would just plugin 1 for t and get the answer. But that seems to be wrong and i can't figure out why. (i did change 7.4 cm to m).

I figured out other parts for this equation to be:
T = 1.51s
k = 22.5 N/m
Vmax = .308 m/s
Fmax = 1.67 N

Any help would be great!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

Well, if you have a position equation that is only a function of time, then yes, you should be able to plug in the time and get the position.

So

Is this an equation that was given to you, or is this an equation you derived from the problem? You may have made a mistake in an earlier step. What exactly did the original problem say?
 
Its an equation given to me.

Problem said exactly what i posted. Everything was given to me and everything is correct.

When i solve this: i get .073965879

Can anyone confirm this? I tried that and it was wrong. (my calculator is in degrees mode - i think that's right)
 
Hello,

Well, I get the same number in degrees mode, but you probably want to be working in radians, as this is the unit typically used for these types of things. Try radians.

What answer are you looking to get?
 
O ok it works in radians.

Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top