Simple Lagrangian question, not getting right answer

  • Thread starter Thread starter Clever-Name
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian
Clever-Name
Messages
378
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A particle of mass 'm' slides on a smooth surface, the shape of which is given by y = Ax^{2} where A is a positive constant of suitable dimensions and y is measured along the vertical direction. The particle is moved slightly away from the position of equilibrium and then released. Write down the equation of motion of the particle.


Homework Equations


Lagrangian
T = \frac{1}{2}m(\dot{y})^{2}
V = mgy

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the chain rule for my derivatives and plugging in the functions for the lagrangian I got:

L = \frac{1}{2}m(2Ax\dot{x})^{2} - mgAx^{2}

Applying this to the Euler-Lagrange equations:

\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}} = 8mA^{2}x(\dot{x})^{2} + 4mA^2x^{2}\ddot{x}

\frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = -2mgAx

End up with, after some cancelling,:

2A^{2}x^{2}\ddot{x} + 4A^{2}x\dot{x}^{2} + gAx = 0

However the solution I have says the final answer should be:

(1 + 4A^{2}x^{2})\ddot{x} + 4A^{2}x\dot{x}^{2} + 2Agx = 0


I can show more detail in my work if needed, I just didn't want to type it all out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your kinetic energy is wrong. You were right to assume you only need one coordinate, but that coordinate needs to represent position along the surface, so it can't be just y. First write your kinetic energy in terms of x-dot and y-dot, then write x and y in terms of this other coordinate and substitute those into the kinetic energy.
 
Of course! Can't believe I missed that. Alright well by applying it that way it boils down to:

(1+4A^{2}x^{2})\ddot{x} + 8A^{2}x\dot{x}^{2} + 2Agx = 0

There's still that factor of 8 infront of the first derivative term that isn't matching with the solution.
 
Clever-Name said:
Of course! Can't believe I missed that. Alright well by applying it that way it boils down to:

(1+4A^{2}x^{2})\ddot{x} + 8A^{2}x\dot{x}^{2} + 2Agx = 0

There's still that factor of 8 infront of the first derivative term that isn't matching with the solution.

I think you need to show more of your work before we can help with that one. There's a contribution to the x*x-dot^2 term from both the dL/dx and dL/dx-dot parts.
 
Double check your algebra. Your dL/dq should have a term that turns that 8 into a 4.
 
Oh.. wow.. Yea I found it. I completely skipped over the x in the velocity term when taking dL/dx.

Thanks for your help guys, it's all fixed now
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top