Simple parallel circuit question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a parallel circuit problem using Kirchhoff's Laws. The user seeks clarification on their equations, confirming that the total voltage in a closed loop equals the sum of the voltage drops across the resistors. They correctly identify the need for additional equations to solve for the currents, realizing they missed a resistor in their calculations. Another participant advises simplifying the problem by reducing the number of variables, which could streamline the solution process. The conversation emphasizes understanding current flow and the application of Kirchhoff's Laws in circuit analysis.
jgv115
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Ok so my maths department decided to give us a question about electrical circuits with no information on how they work. Considering that more than half of the students are only starting their physics study this year (including me) it seems a bit odd... I just need a bit of clarification on a few things.

Diagram here:
wQqvUiu.png


I understand that Kirchoff's Law says that the total change in electrical potential around a closed loop is zero.
So that means we have... V = i_{2}R + i_{7}R and also V= i_{3}R + i_{4}R. Is this correct so far?

Another law I found was that the sum of all currents at any node in the circuit is zero..

So we have... i_{2} -i_{3} - i_{7} = 0 and i_{5} + i_{7} - i_{6} = 0

If this is all correct, then I have 4 equations... I need a total of 7 to solve for the values of the currents in terms of V and R.

Unfortunately, that is as far as my knowledge takes me... Could someone point me in some direction as to how I could find the other equations.

Is by any change i_{3} = i_{4} = i_{5} and i_{1} + i_{2} + i_{6}

Thanks in advanced
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi jgv115! http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif

Current doesn't evaporate or get used up, so i3 = i4 = i5
and i1 = i2 = i6
and i7 + i5 = i6

If your arrows indicate current direction, then they should all be reversed because current goes from the large (+) terminal then around the circuit and back into the battery's stubby terminal. (As your diagram stands, the arrows are correct for electron flow. Conventional current is said to flow in the opposite direction―an historical anomaly.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi, NascentOxygen

Thanks for the simple explanation (which is all I needed for this maths question).

Could you perhaps confirm whether or not V= i_{3}R + i_{4}R

I'm just a bit worried that because the current gets split at the top node that this somehow isn't correct.

Thank you
 
jgv115 said:
Could you perhaps confirm whether or not V= i_{3}R + i_{4}R

No, you have missed a resistor out of that closed loop.
 
Hmm... does that mean I'm missing the resistor above i_{2}?

That makes it V= i_{3}R + i_{4}R + i_{2}R. Is that right?
 
Yes that's right! Does it help if you simplify the whole thing e.g. by setting ## j = i_7 ## and ## k = i_3 = i_4 = i_5 ## ? You then only have two variables so only need two equations, and you have two closed loops over which you can apply Kirchoff's Law...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top