Simple Pendulum amplitude problem

AI Thread Summary
A pendulum with a 150 cm amplitude and a 2.1s period was analyzed for angular velocity, displacement, angular acceleration, and length. The calculations revealed an angular velocity of 2.99 rad/s, a corrected displacement of 0.9 m, and an angular acceleration of -8.05. The length of the pendulum was determined to be 1.1 m after correcting a calculation error. The discussion emphasized the importance of using radians in calculations and highlighted the need for attention to detail in mathematical operations. Overall, the participant gained confidence in their answers and expressed gratitude for the assistance received.
SeanGillespie
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A pendulum with a swing amplitude of 150 cm is recorded to have a period of 2.1s. Calculate after 0.3s release from the furthest amplitude position.

a) Angular velocity
b) displacement
c) Angular acceleration
d) Length of the pendulum


I've only had one lecture on circular motion and the motion of pendulums, so I'm a bit unsure of the correct steps for each calculation.


Homework Equations


\omega = \frac{2\pi}{T}

x = A cos (\omega t)

a = -\omega^{2}x

T = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}

The Attempt at a Solution



a)
\omega = \frac{2\pi}{2.1} = 2.99 rad s^{-1}

b)
x = 1.5 cos (2.99 x 0.3) = 1.5 m

c)
a = -(2.99)^{2} x 1.5 = -13.41

d)
l = \frac{T^{2}g}{2\pi^{2}} = 106.74 m


I'm not convinced that I'm getting b) right, as it seems odd for the displacement after 0.3 seconds to be the same as the amplitude. This makes me believe that I'm wrong in other places.

See what's wrong? [I don't have the answers to check for myself]

Any similar problems to practice on would be welcomed; I don't want to constantly feel that I'm missing something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
one problem I see is that in part d) you should be dividing by 4, not 2
 
srmeier said:
one problem I see is that in part d) you should be dividing by 4, not 2

also, I do not get the same answer as you do for part b). Make sure your calculator is in radiant, not degrees.

(I am assuming the extra x in the cosine function was a typo)
 
Oh yes, I think I made a typo when I typed the post; it's 4 PI in my notes. Regardless of that I made a calculation error on that part...

I now have L = 1.1m for d).

Thanks.
 
SeanGillespie said:
Oh yes, I think I made a typo when I typed the post; it's 4 PI in my notes. Regardless of that I made a calculation error on that part...

I now have L = 1.1m for d).

Thanks.

also, check to see if your calculator is in radians. For part B)
 
Ah... thank you.

Neglected to think that I was working with radians.

b) 0.9 m
c) -8.05

I assume that I've got the right set of answers for the question now.
 
yes, your physics appears flawless.
 
I think d) is 1.1m.

I was getting 106.74 by forgetting to bracket the 4pi^2; it was dividing by 4 and then multiplying by pi^2. Don't know why, I thought that calculators multiplied before dividing.
 
SeanGillespie said:
I think d) is 1.1m.

I was getting 106.74 by forgetting to bracket the 4pi^2; it was dividing by 4 and then multiplying by pi^2. Don't know why, I thought that calculators multiplied before dividing.

details my friend, details :smile:

The physics is the important part.
 
  • #10
Thank you for your help; now I can move on and get stuck on something else. Midterm tests next week... :(
 
  • #11
SeanGillespie said:
Thank you for your help; now I can move on and get stuck on something else. Midterm tests next week... :(

Good luck my friend! may the ma be with you :cool:
 

Similar threads

Back
Top