Simple question about total angular momentum in an atom

jimmypoopins
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the 6g state of an electron in a hydrogen atom.

Enter the smallest possible value of the total angular momentum quantum number.


Homework Equations


hund's rules:
1. the total spin angular momentum S should be maximized to the extent possible without violating the Pauli exclusion principle.
2. Insofar as rule 1 is not violated, L should also be maximized.
3. For atoms having subshells less than half full, J should be minimized.

j=l (+ or -) s

l=4 (for g)


The Attempt at a Solution



I know this is a simple question but i can't seem to comprehend spin very well. I suppose my biggest problem is that i don't know what "s" (spin angular momentum) is and i don't know how to find it out. is it just 1/2 since it's a hydrogen atom?

if that's the case it seems like we need to maximize both l and s, so
j_min=l-s=4-1/2 but if i recall correctly the answers on the multiple choice test were integers (this question is for test corrections)

i can't seem to find out very much information in either my physics book or online sources (wikipedia, etc.) so if someone could point me in the right direction i'd really appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jimmypoopins said:

Homework Statement


Consider the 6g state of an electron in a hydrogen atom.

Enter the smallest possible value of the total angular momentum quantum number.
If this is the question, then the answer is simple.
g means L=4. The electron has spin 1/2, so the minimum J is 4-1/2=7/2.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top