Simple question regarding higher frequency vs lower frequency

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doc Z
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a sinusoidal force acting on a mass-spring system. The user successfully calculated the higher frequency of 1.33 Hz but sought assistance in finding the lower frequency. It was noted that the amplitude equation involves frequency terms that are squared, leading to potential negative square roots. The user realized their oversight regarding the negative sign in their calculations. The conversation also touched on notification issues within the forum system.
Doc Z
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Damping is negligible for a 0.145 kg object hanging from a light 6.30 N/m spring. A sinusoidal force with an amplitude of 1.70 N drives the system. At what frequency will the force make the object vibrate with an amplitude of 0.440 m?

Homework Equations



I don't know how to put formulas in here but basically find out the initial omega value, then plug it into the forced oscillations amplitude equation to get the angular frequency. Then use the frequency formula to get your frequency.

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's the problem!

The question asks me for 2 solutions -- higher frequency and lower frequency.

I obtained the higher frequency given the equations above and it is indeed the correct answer. That answer is 1.33 Hz.

Now how do I get the lower frequency? It's not -1.33 if anyone is wondering.

Thanks for the help guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, Doc Z.

It's been a while since I solved this type of problem. But I remember that the amplitude equation involves frequency terms that are squared.

When you worked through your solution, you probably took a square root at some point. Did you consider the negative square root as well?
 
Sorry for the late response, for some reason I didn't get an email when I receive a reply to a thread.

Thank you very much! It was just a stupid mistake on my part, I completely forgot about the negative sign.
 
Doc Z said:
... for some reason I didn't get an email when I receive a reply to a thread.

Yeah, that happens sometimes. It seems to be a bug in the system.

If you click on "My PF" at the top left of the page, you'll see a list of recent replies in threads you are subscribed to. I have abandoned email notification in favor of this other way of checking for recent replies.

Glad the HW problem worked out.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top