MHB Simplification and manipulation

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathnap7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manipulation
mathnap7
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I've been stuck on a problem and after much simplification, it has been reduced to the following:

Is it possible to factor out the (a^2 - b^2) bit. For example, if a = b, the equation would not be valid. Is there any way to factor it out using manipulation?

Best wishes,

'nap
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathnap7 said:
Hi All,

I've been stuck on a problem and after much simplification, it has been reduced to the following:

Is it possible to factor out the (a^2 - b^2) bit. For example, if a = b, the equation would not be valid. Is there any way to factor it out using manipulation?

Best wishes,

'nap
Well [math]a^2 - b^2 = (a + b)(a - b)[/math] but it sounds like you are after something different. Can you post the whole problem?

-Dan
 
mathnap7 said:
Hi All,

I've been stuck on a problem and after much simplification, it has been reduced to the following:

Is it possible to factor out the (a^2 - b^2) bit. For example, if a = b, the equation would not be valid. Is there any way to factor it out using manipulation?

Best wishes,

'nap

This is a relatively common expression known as the difference of two squares and is well worth committing to memory to save time

$$a^2-b^2 = (a-b)(a+b)$$
 
Apologies, I am not too familiar with using the LaTeX plugin.

\frac{a^2b^3}{2(a^2-b^2)}\frac{(cos\phi -1)}{(a^2sin^2\phi +b^2cos^2\phi}
 
The expression is
\[
\frac{a^2b^3}{2(a^2-b^2)}\cdot\frac{\cos\phi -1}{a^2\sin^2\phi +b^2\cos^2\phi}
\]
Is there a problem in leaving it like this?

Is it possible to factor out the (a^2 - b^2) bit. For example, if a = b, the equation would not be valid. Is there any way to factor it out using manipulation?
The original expression is indeed undefined when $a=b$, and it is not just a removable singularity. Algebraic manipulations will not make it defined when $a=b$.

It may indeed help if you post the whole problem.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top