Simplify Equation - Can You Help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hermano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplify
hermano
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to simplify the following equation, but I'm not sure it can be! Can anybody help me please?

<br /> \frac{sin(\alpha + \delta \alpha)} {sin(\beta + \delta \beta - \alpha - \delta \alpha)} - \frac{sin(\alpha)} {sin(\beta - \alpha)} <br />
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hermano said:
Hi,

I'm trying to simplify the following equation, but I'm not sure it can be! Can anybody help me please?

<br /> \frac{sin(\alpha + \delta \alpha)} {sin(\beta + \delta \beta - \alpha - \delta \alpha)} - \frac{sin(\alpha)} {sin(\beta - \alpha)} <br />

That's not an equation (no equal sign), it is an expression. What is the full equation?

What is the context of the question? Is it for schoolwork, or for a physical problem?
 
berkeman said:
That's not an equation (no equal sign), it is an expression. What is the full equation?

What is the context of the question? Is it for schoolwork, or for a physical problem?

Oke, the full equation is
<br /> \epsilon = \frac{sin(\alpha + \delta \alpha)} {sin(\beta + \delta \beta - \alpha - \delta \alpha)} - \frac{sin(\alpha)} {sin(\beta - \alpha)} <br />

It is for an error analyses of a physical problem!

Thanks
 
Welcome to PF, hermano! :smile:

Let's define f(x) = {\sin(\alpha x) \over sin(\gamma x)}.
Do you know what the definition of f'(1) is?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
940
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
818
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top