Single Particle Dynamics in EM Fields.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the energy equation for a charged particle from its equation of motion, which is influenced by electric and magnetic fields. The equation of motion is given as m(dv/dt) = q(E + v x B). The key step involves projecting this equation onto the particle's velocity vector, leading to the energy equation d/dt(1/2 mv^2) = qE·v. A participant clarifies that dotting the first equation with the velocity vector and differentiating the kinetic energy term yields the desired result. This method effectively connects the dynamics of the particle to its energy change in electromagnetic fields.
peterjaybee
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am having trouble seeing how to derive the energy equation for a charged particle from the equation of motion.

The equation of motion is

m\frac{d\bar{v}}{dt}=q(\bar{E}+\bar{v} \times \bar{B})

Then in the notes I have it says "projecting the eq. of motion onto the particles velocity vector leads to the particles energy equation:"

\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{1}{2}m\bar{v}^{2}\right)=q\bar{E}\cdot\bar{v}

Could someone please take me through the steps inbetween these two equations, or explain what is meant by projecting the equation of motion onto the particles motion please.

Many Thanks,

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dot the first equation with the vector v, and you will get the second equation after performing the time differentiation of 1/2 mv^2.
 
Got it, Thanks :smile:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top