Sketching Locus of arg(z+w^*)=arg(-iw) for Complex Loci Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter truewt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on sketching the locus defined by the equation arg(z + w*) = arg(-iw) under the constraint π/2 < arg(z) < π. Participants express confusion about how to represent the locus, with initial thoughts suggesting shading the first and fourth quadrants, though this is later clarified to be incorrect. The locus is determined to exist in the second quadrant, where the angle with the x-axis corresponds to that of the complex number -iw. The final conclusion is that the locus is a line segment rather than an area, as it represents a family of lines with a specific slope rather than a filled region. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the angles involved in the complex plane to accurately sketch the locus.
truewt
Messages
78
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given that a complex number, w, is such that \pi / 2&lt; arg(z) &lt; \pi,

Sketch the locus described by arg(z+w^*)=arg(-iw)



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so I attempted this question and got completely confused. I am thinking that the answer is to shade the first and fourth quadrant completely, that's an intuition (although there can be an explanation for this intuition, but I have no idea how to sketch it out online, sorry). But generally, how should I go about attempting this question? Over here, w is defined by a range instead of any distinct line, thus I am getting the problem of carrying this definition over to my solution of the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By the constraints of the problem, the locus exists in the second quadrant such that the angle it makes at any point with the x-axis is equal to the angle the complex number -iw makes with the x axis. If w is inclined at an angle \theta, then -iw is inclined to the x-axis at an angle -(\theta +\frac{\pi}{2}).
 
Yes, so what I was thinking is that is the answer "shade the entire first and fourth quadrant?"
 
Not the fourth quadrant, because the argument is restricted from pi/2 to pi. Whoa... I wrote a whole post that's missing...basically, it came out to be a straight line segment with the slope tan(3pi/2+theta). y=tan(3pi/2+theta)x is what finally came out. This has to be restricted to the second quadrant, hence its a line segment and not a whole line. Use the eular form of i to get the angle, and since its -(theta+pi/2), the final angle is tan(pi-(-(theta+pi/2))).
 
Why is it only a line segment instead of an area? Theta takes values between pi and pi/2 isn't it?
 
Its a line segment because the equation describes a certain family of lines with a given slope. The position of the line may vary, but that doesn't make it an area.
 
Doesn't the varying of the line make it an area? As in, how do you describe the locus by drawing?
 
chaoseverlasting said:
By the constraints of the problem, the locus exists in the second quadrant such that the angle it makes at any point with the x-axis is equal to the angle the complex number -iw makes with the x axis. If w is inclined at an angle \theta, then -iw is inclined to the x-axis at an angle -(\theta +\frac{\pi}{2}).

are you sure its -(\theta +\frac{\pi}{2}) and not \theta -\frac{\pi}{2}?
 
Yeah. I am sure. There's a minus sign to consider.
 
Back
Top