Sketching Root Locus: n=2, m=1, Angle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tekneek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Root Root locus
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the characteristics of root locus diagrams in control systems, specifically focusing on a system with two poles and one zero. Participants explore the implications of having repeated poles, the calculation of angles of departure, and the behavior of root curves on the real axis.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why there are two branches in the root locus when there appears to be only one pole at zero, suggesting that the repeated pole at s=0 may count as two poles due to the s² term.
  • There is a discussion about the angle of departure, with one participant stating that the angle calculated using the formula (2h+1)/n-m * 180° consistently yields 180°, which seems inconsistent with the observed diagram.
  • Another participant clarifies that the 180° mentioned refers to the angle between the two branches, not the angle between a branch and the real axis.
  • Participants introduce rules regarding angles between branches and the conditions for root curves on the real axis, noting that the presence of poles and zeros influences these curves.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the concept of a root curve on the real axis and seeks clarification on how to determine the movement pattern of the root locus.
  • Another participant explains that poles repel roots while zeros attract them, and they suggest experimenting with different sets of poles and zeros to observe the resulting root curves.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the root locus behavior, particularly regarding the angle of departure and the nature of the root curves. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing interpretations and no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the behavior of repeated poles and the specific conditions under which the rules apply. Some mathematical steps and definitions are not fully clarified, contributing to the uncertainty in the discussion.

Tekneek
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
The characteristic equation is 1+K(S+1)/S2 Below is the root locus diagram. I don't get why there are two branches when there is only one pole, at 0. Does it count as having two poles even if it is the same because of s^2 ? If it does then why doesn't the angle of departure make sense?

number of poles(n) = 2
number of zeros(m) = 1

angle = (2h+1)/n-m * 180 = keep getting the same angle, 180

The angle certainly does not look like 180 as it departs from its pole...
95whgh.jpg
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Tekneek said:
The characteristic equation is 1+K(S+1)/S2 Below is the root locus diagram. I don't get why there are two branches when there is only one pole, at 0. Does it count as having two poles even if it is the same because of s^2 ? If it does then why doesn't the angle of departure make sense?

number of poles(n) = 2
number of zeros(m) = 1

angle = (2h+1)/n-m * 180 = keep getting the same angle, 180

The angle certainly does not look like 180 as it departs from its pole...

Yes, there are two poles, s2 = (s+0)(s+0)

The mentioned angle is the angle between the two branches (180°), not the angle between a branch and the real-axis.

I don't recognize this formula: angle = (2h+1)/n-m * 180°.

Rule 1) If the number of poles in the same point = n, then the angle between the n branches = 360°/n.

Rule 2) There will be a root-curve on the real-axis at a point, if the number of real (zeroes+poles) to the right of that point is odd.
 
Last edited:
Hesch said:
Yes, there are two poles, s2 = (s+0)(s+0)

The mentioned angle is the angle between the two branches (180°), not the angle between a branch and the real-axis.

I don't recognize this formula: angle = (2h+1)/n-m * 180°.

Rule 1) If the number of poles in the same point = n, then the angle between the n branches = 360°/n.

Rule 2) There will be a root-curve on the real-axis at a point, if the number of real (zeroes+poles) to the right of that point is odd.

What does it mean by root-curve on the real axis? Also how would I know the root locus moves in a circular pattern?
 
Tekneek said:
What does it mean by root-curve on the real axis?

Look at your attached figure: There is a root-curve (actually 2) on the real axis (imaginary part = 0) for s < -1, because there is 1 zero and 2 poles to the right of all points on the real axis when s < -1.

Tekneek said:
Also how would I know the root locus moves in a circular pattern?

Poles will repel roots and zeros will attrack roots as the amplification in a control-loop is increased. Say you have three poles in the same point. If not the roots should leave these poles in a mutual angle of 120°, what should they do instead, and why?

Having left the startpoint (at some distance from the startpoint) the roots will no longer spread symmetrically because they then "can sense" other poles (repelling) and zeros (attracking).

Recommendation: Invent some sets of poles and zeroes and "play" with them on your screen. See what the root-curves will do in different combinations. Confirm the rules in #2.

Examples here:

https://www.google.com/search?q=roo...KcsgH064D4CQ&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=1366&bih=635
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K