Sliding Block Attached to a Spring

AI Thread Summary
A block with a mass of 2.90 kg is attached to a spring with a force constant of 492.0 N/m and experiences kinetic friction with a coefficient of 0.170. The block is pulled 5.30 cm from its equilibrium position and released from rest, prompting a discussion on calculating its speed at the equilibrium position. The work done by friction and the spring's potential energy are central to finding the block's speed, with emphasis on the work-energy theorem, which relates work done to changes in kinetic and potential energy. Clarification on the use of variable force in work calculations is also highlighted, noting that W = ∫ F dx is necessary when force is not constant. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
AltruistKnight
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block with mass 2.90kg is attached as shown to a spring with a force constant of 492.0N/m. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and the surface on which it slides is 0.170. The block is pulled 5.30cm to the right of its equilibrium position and then released from rest. What is the speed of the block as it passes by its equilibrium position?

Rough image:

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/|B_L_O_C_K|

Homework Equations


PEspring=1/2kx^2
Fspring=kx
Ffriction=(mu)*Force Normal
Work=F*d

The Attempt at a Solution


First, I found the force of Friction by multiplying the coefficient of friction by the force normal of the block due to gravity ("ma=mg=2.9*9.81=28.449N). Then, I attempted to use W=F*d to find the work done by friction. I then decided to try finding Wspring=F*d=kx*d (Where "d"=x, thus it would be "x^2"), and from there assumed that the Wnet=Wspring-Wfriction. However, that doesn't appear to be the proper method. In particular, if someone could explain the relationship of Work to Kinetic Energy AS WELL AS Potential Energy, that would be very helpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi AltruistKnight! :wink:
AltruistKnight said:
PEspring=1/2kx^2

First, I found the force of Friction by multiplying the coefficient of friction by the force normal of the block due to gravity ("ma=mg=2.9*9.81=28.449N). Then, I attempted to use W=F*d to find the work done by friction.

correct :smile:
I then decided to try finding Wspring=F*d=kx*d (Where "d"=x, thus it would be "x^2"),

no, W = F*d only works if F is constant

if it isn't, you use W = ∫ F dx, which in this case is -1/2 kx2 (= -∆PE)

(btw, that was in your equations above … why didn't you use it? :confused:)

now carry on :smile:
In particular, if someone could explain the relationship of Work to Kinetic Energy AS WELL AS Potential Energy, that would be very helpful.

the work-energy theorem says work done = change in mechanical energy (ie change in KE + PE) :wink:

(and potential energy is defined as minus the work done by a conservative force)
 
  • Like
Likes proton007007
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top