Small Flat Universe? How is it Possible?

In summary, the prevailing theory states that the universe is about 78G light years across, and recent evidence shows that it is perfectly flat. However, this does not necessarily mean that the universe is infinite in size. The concept of flatness refers to the balance between expansion and contraction, not the extent of the universe. The observable universe is finite due to its finite age and the speed of light, but the size of the entire universe is still unknown.
  • #1
benk99nenm312
302
0
So, I now understand based on things that I have read, and things that people on this forum have told me, that the universe if flat, must be infinite. My question is, when we look into the farthest reaches of space, we see a small, finite baby universe. How is this possible? The universe can be traced back to a point when it was 10^-33 cm small. Anything infinite begins infinite, from what I have always understood. What's going on, eh?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
benk99nenm312 said:
My question is, when we look into the farthest reaches of space, we see a small, finite baby universe.
We do?
 
  • #3
davec426913 said:
we do?

The WMAP.

(poorly stated by me)
 
  • #4
benk99nenm312 said:
The WMAP.

(poorly stated by me)
OK, the WMAP shows that the universe was small and hot at one point. This it the prevailing theory. The prevailing theory holds that the universe is about 78G ly across.

There are theories that the universe is infinite, but they are not prevailing theories, partly because, well, the evidence seems to poke a hole in them.
 
  • #5
The most recent evidence on the shape of the universe tells us that it is perfectly flat (to within experimental and measurable error). So, what you're saying is that the prevailing theory contradicts the newest intel?
 
  • #6
benk99nenm312 said:
The most recent evidence on the shape of the universe tells us that it is perfectly flat (to within experimental and measurable error). So, what you're saying is that the prevailing theory contradicts the newest intel?

I think that the starting premise: "if the universe is flat, it must be infinite" is flawed, or at least misunderstood.

Flatness simply refers to the balance between expansion and contraction; it does not imply infinite extent.
 
  • #7
DaveC426913 said:
I think that the starting premise: "if the universe is flat, it must be infinite" is flawed, or at least misunderstood.

Flatness simply refers to the balance between expansion and contraction; it does not imply infinite extent.

I have read and heard this. I'll look for links tomorrow.
 
  • #8
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #9
It seems to me that you're confusing the idea of the entire universe with that of the observable universe. Since the universe has finite age and light travels at a finite speed, we can only observe structures that are close enough to us for light to have propagated to us within the time that the universe has existed. We generally expect that the universe is larger than just what we can see. I believe that the 78 Gly is the best number for the current size of the observable universe. It is unknown how much larger the whole universe is.
 
  • #10
Parlyne said:
It seems to me that you're confusing the idea of the entire universe with that of the observable universe. Since the universe has finite age and light travels at a finite speed, we can only observe structures that are close enough to us for light to have propagated to us within the time that the universe has existed. We generally expect that the universe is larger than just what we can see. I believe that the 78 Gly is the best number for the current size of the observable universe. It is unknown how much larger the whole universe is.

So what you're sayin gis that the observable universe was once very, very small, but the entire universe's size is unknown, even at the big bang?
 
  • #11
benk99nenm312 said:
So what you're sayin gis that the observable universe was once very, very small, but the entire universe's size is unknown, even at the big bang?

Quite right.
 
  • #12
Ahh, now it makes sense.
 

1. What is a small flat universe?

A small flat universe is a theoretical concept in cosmology that suggests the universe is finite in size and has a flat or nearly flat geometry. This means that the universe has a constant curvature and is not expanding or contracting.

2. How can the universe be both small and flat?

The concept of a small flat universe is based on the idea that the observable universe is only a small part of a much larger, infinite universe. This means that while the observable universe appears flat, the entire universe may have a different shape or curvature.

3. What evidence supports the idea of a small flat universe?

The concept of a small flat universe is supported by observations of the cosmic microwave background radiation, which is the leftover radiation from the Big Bang. These observations show that the universe has a nearly uniform temperature and density, which is consistent with a flat geometry.

4. How does a small flat universe differ from other cosmological models?

Other cosmological models, such as the Big Bang theory, suggest that the universe is infinite in size and has a curved geometry. This means that the universe is either expanding or contracting and has a changing curvature over time.

5. Is the idea of a small flat universe widely accepted in the scientific community?

The concept of a small flat universe is still a topic of debate in the scientific community. While some researchers support this idea, others propose alternative models for the shape and size of the universe. Further research and observations will be needed to fully understand the true nature of our universe.

Similar threads

Replies
54
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
984
  • Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • Cosmology
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
96
Views
9K
Back
Top